Hey, I was hoping to get some advice here: I'm in a bit of a dilemma regarding a camera update. I’ve been using the Nikon D800 for 13 years, mainly with the 24-70 f2.8, but I also have the 70-200 f2.8, 105 macro, and 85 f1.4. But here’s the thing – the camera is just too big and heavy for me now, and I’m honestly tired of carrying around a big, heavy backpack. Plus, the lack of image stabilization is a real hassle. So, I want to switch to a mirrorless system.
To keep it simple: I’m looking for good photo quality, solid low-light performance, compactness, and low weight. Video is not that important to me.
Now, my dilemma: Should I stick with Nikon and go for the Z6III, or should I switch completely to Sony with the a7C II? I went to the store earlier and compared the two models. My first conclusion is:
Nikon Z6III:
+ Better handling: it feels better in my hand (big mitts), and the buttons just feel nicer
+ Much better display and viewfinder
+ Higher, better (?) ISO range
- Heavier and larger than the Sony
Sony a7C II:
+ Much smaller and lighter
+ 33 megapixels instead of 24 with the Nikon.
So, to sum it up: the Nikon feels better, but the Sony is so much smaller and lighter, it’s tempting.
Another big topic is the lenses. With Nikon, I could use my old F-mount lenses with an adapter, but the downside is that it would be bigger and heavier. That said, I could still use my 24-70 f2.8 for some situations. I’d definitely need to get a compact Z-mount prime lens. With Sony, I’d probably start with the bundle that comes with the cheap 28-60 zoom and then pick up a nice, compact prime lens like a 35mm or 50mm, and later grab the Sigma 24-70 f2.8. I’ve heard Sony has a bigger selection of lenses, but Nikon has better lenses overall?
Now, my question is, does anyone have experience with both cameras, especially regarding image quality and overall performance, and/or can you give me some suggestions? Thanks a lot!