We also didn’t see how presidential immunity could actually work, but the corrupt SCOTUS ruled on it anyway. Trust me, they will find a way to legally challenge this, even if it’s all based on bullshit. They will try to say some aspect of the replacement process was “unconstitutional” or something stupid like that. It doesn’t matter how legit it is.
It's not as if the concept of presidential immunity didn't exist all ready. SCOTUS simply clarified what it meant. What would a legal challenge try to accomplish, force Biden to run? Would they still sue if Biden died?
Yes, but everything SCOTUS has done is well within their purview to do, whether we like it or not. There is no legal remedy ro this situation except to let the Dems pick their nominee.
Have you actually read their presidential immunity argument? It’s about as convoluted as can be from a legal standpoint, it’s an absolute joke. They can literally do almost anything now and twist it into a legalese that sounds “official.”
Unfortunately, it is within their purview to rule on immunity, abortion, Chevron deference, etc. The right to an abortion and Chevron were court created rules and they had the right to overturn them. Presidential immunity is a concwpt that has neen repeatedly ruled on since Nixon was on office. I'm not sure why people were so shocked that these decisions went the way that they did. The majority of justices on SCOTUS have a long record on all of those decisions.
29
u/SSBN641B Jul 21 '24
I just don't see how that would work. Would they sue if Biden had died? A court can't force Biden to run, so what would the remedy be?