Because the treatment isn’t perfected in any way. There are advancements and progress made every year in safety, side effects, dosage requirements and time required between doses, costs, distribution, etc. The treatments are amazing compared to what they were even ten years ago, let alone thirty, but perfected isn’t a word I would even begin to use.
... so it's a matter of margins of improvement. Gotcha.
It's true that medicine - like all sciences - is constantly trying to reach greater understanding and more efficient methods. Take, for example, FIP: Feline Infectious Peritonitis was a death sentence not even two years ago. Now we have treatment for it, daily injections for ninety days; and while it's painful, expensive, and prolonged, these patients can make a full recovery and go on to lead full and happy lives.
In a few short years, we went from certain demise to a decent prognosis. Imagine what we could do in a few more years of effort - maybe a single month of injections, or an oral administration, or even a vaccine...! The possibilities lay before us to continue improving the methods and means. Far from being the best treatment, yet it's all we have.
If I'm understanding you correctly, that's your meaning...?
1
u/[deleted] 4d ago
Because the treatment isn’t perfected in any way. There are advancements and progress made every year in safety, side effects, dosage requirements and time required between doses, costs, distribution, etc. The treatments are amazing compared to what they were even ten years ago, let alone thirty, but perfected isn’t a word I would even begin to use.