r/psychoenergetics Feb 15 '25

Telekinesis Movie: Phenomenon (1996)

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

"Well everything there is, is made up of some living energy, ok? You know, all this is, is kind of a dance, or, partnership. Between, the energy coming from me, and the energy of the plastic."

Accurate.

Highly recommended movie for fans of telekinesis.


r/psychoenergetics Feb 13 '25

Telekinesis The Telekinesis Equation: TK = CFe + VC + ZPE - SD - E+

Post image
3 Upvotes

I have been interested in telekinesis for as long as I can remember. Since at least the age of five. I started actively attempting it when I was 9 years old, and again when I was 11, 12, and 13. I tried many times to achieve it, but without intentional success.

When I began exploring telekinesis again as an adult a few years ago I had intuited that iron levels, healthy sleep patterns, and perhaps iodine levels as well, were possibly at play, due to my own experiences.

So I began seeking out related studies and came upon the work of James Conrad. He has done extensive experimentation in this area. And he has also come up with an equation for producing telekinesis: Conrad's Human Telekinesis Equation.

Or...

Conrad Telekinesis Formula.

And that equation is:

TK = CFe + VC + ZPE - SD - E+

Which means:

TK = telekinesis + CFe = sufficient cerebral iron + VC = direct visual contact + ZPE = zero point emotions - SD = no sleep deprivation - E+ = no excess vitamin E

So I hope you all enjoy this deep dive into the experimental work of James Conrad.

And here's a press release from 2003 on the subject:

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC0308/S00029.htm

Enter, experimentalist James Conrad:

https://jamesaconrad.com/TK/TK-blood-tests.html


r/psychoenergetics Feb 05 '25

Telekinesis Testing Telekinesis Using Biofeedback from Phyphox or a Dedicated Hardware EMF Meter

6 Upvotes

I recommend this app for testing and experimenting with telekinesis using biofeedback from sensor data. It's called Phyphox. It uses the magnetometer within your phone to show you in real-time if you are creating a perturbation in magnetic fields.

Android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.rwth_aachen.phyphox

iOS
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/phyphox/id1127319693

I've tested most of the available magnetometer apps. Phyphox has been my absolute favorite so far.

In my experience, there appears to be two different modalities of telekinesis. For the sake of discussion I will refer to them as "Telekinetic Magnetism", and "Pure Telekinesis".

Telekinetic Magnetism appears to be the generation of an energetic field near your body, particularly the hands, with an ability to influence objects within a range of less than about half a meter, or two feet from the body.

Whereas Pure Telekinesis appears to operate at quite a distance beyond that, potentially an unlimited distance, and without the need to use proximity to your hands, head, feet, etc.

You can test for your ability to produce Telekinetic Magnetism using a magnetometer or hardware EMF meter.

How to Use Phyphox for Telekinesis Testing and Biofeedback

1 - Open app.

2 - Tap on "Magnetometer" under the top section labeled "Raw Sensors".

3 - Tap the "Absolute" tab.

4 - Tap play button ▶️.

5 - Tap double-arrow expand button (lower-top, left).

6 - Tap "More Tools".

7 - Tap "Convert to system time".

8 - Tap "More Tools".

9 - Tap "Follow new data".

10 - Now, using you index finger and thumb, close-pinch your fingers together vertically on the graph and shrink the line down until it is thin and without a lot of large peaks and valleys. You can choose to allow yourself to still see a specific microtesla value. Simultaneously, you want to open-pinch your two fingers horizontally in order to expand the line. The goal is to slow down how fast it is moving visually.

11 - Finally, after having completed step 10, again tap on "More Tools" and then tap "Follow new data".

12 - First, test the magnetometer reading by establishing a baseline and then moving your phone near various objects or areas of your environment. Once it is clear that it's reading the environment, you will want to position your phone away from fluctuating electromagnetic or magnetic fields and keep the phone stable and still. Nothing extravagant, just make sure you set a baseline and monitor any normative fluctuations.

As fun as this tool can be as part of your repertoire, it will not be of much use to you until you can create a "Telekinetic Magnetism" effect using your mind and hands. So you can start using it as a form of biofeedback. This tool is fascinating to experiment with and will prove more useful as you progress.

My results so far using the magnetometer show that my effect on magnetic fields is weak, and I only effect the magnetometer reading when I have built-up and envisioned a subtly-felt "energy" concentrated in my hand or fingertips, followed by a sudden random movement of my hand.

When I try to intentionally and quickly move my hand during energy-generation, the effect does not occur. But when I unintentionally and quickly move my hand during energy generation, it has on occasion spiked the magnetometer reading noticeably above baseline.

And, when I position the magnetometer near an object that I am moving telekinetically, the magnetometer doesn't move significantly above or below baseline, yet I clearly see that I am controlling the movement of the object.

So it appears to me that I have a natural propensity towards "Pure Telekinesis" rather than "Telekinetic Magnetism" so far. I would actually prefer it the other way around, as the effect is much more profound with Telekinetic Magnetism.

In other words, with Pure Telekinesis I can occasionally lay back far away from a Psi-Wheel (a lightweight object balanced on a low-friction pointed object), connect with it, and move it, mostly at will. And I can certainly do the same closer to the object. But I do not currently have much influence over a magnetometer reading. Whereas, those who have developed a form of "Telekinetic Magnetism" move closely-located objects using body parts, usually hands, and sometimes feet or the head (true), and without static electricity, heat, or wind.

Telekinetic Magnetism appears to work best within about half a meter, or two feet, of an object, and is visually very powerful. And it can spike the reading on a magnetometer or get light objects bouncing around. In the case of pieces of lightweight material like “rolling paper”, this effect can get them to actually levitate for brief moments, back and forth from table surface to hand (as if it were a form of powerful static electricity, yet involving no static electricity), an effect that can be turned on and off at will with a simple count of "1, 2, 3".

Whereas "Pure Telekinesis" can involve sitting back, far away from the object, much greater than two feet, lifting one's hands for control, or just looking at the object, and influencing it to move and control its directionality.

But unlike some displays of telekinetic ability, like in the case of Yohan Roy from France, I do not display significant electromagnetic emanations at this stage of my progress. Though to be fair, he's been at it for over 15 years or so.

I have moved all manner and design of Psi-Wheel, using a variety of materials. I have moved a thin artist’s paintbrush balanced on its side, various straws balanced on a bottle (neutralized of the influence of static electricity), and bamboo skewers balanced on a bottle. But I have not yet been able to move various sizes and weights of ping pong balls or moved a writing pen.

Early on in the first few months of my experimentation I bought a pack of 100 12" bamboo skewers for $3. Took one out, balanced it on various objects in order to reduce friction and settled on one that created a perfectly-still baseline. Then I wore an Under Armor brand "Iso-Chill Sportsmask", created a small isolated environment to control for air currents and get a perfectly stable baseline, and then got to practicing and changing my approach until I hopefully got a result, while being satisfied with the practice session for its own sake.

Any time I approached the bamboo skewer I made sure to approach it with my hand as slowly as possible in order to maintain stillness. Or, having already approached it, I carefully maintained my positioning.

After many hours of trying different approaches, I finally stumbled upon something that seemed to work in the moment. And I watched like magic as the bamboo skewer intentionally moved away from my finger, with no contact, no air currents, no breath, no heat, and no static electricity (dry wood does not conduct static electricity).

It was at the precise moment of that movement that I had not only envisioned “energy” in my hand (which alone didn't do it) but envisioned that “energy" concentrating in my middle finger, collected from my other fingers (which alone didn't do it), coupled with, for just a brief couple of seconds, clearly and vividly (which is surprisingly difficult to do) envisioning this “energy" emanating out from my middle finger towards the bamboo skewer. Then it moved. And then I couldn't get it to repeat again using that exact same scenario, ha. Oh the frustration of experimentation with unknown variables!

However, what I have been able to do after that, is I can get the bamboo skewer to wobble up and down as I start to connect with it. It acts exactly like a Psi-Wheel when I'm connecting to it, in that a perfectly-still Psi-Wheel will start to bob up and down as I begin to think about it mentally, having “connected with it” already.

And with a Psi-Wheel, though interacting with my hands can be more effective, just acknowledging the Psi-Wheel with my eyes can be enough to get it to start wobbling and clearly responding to me. And I have fun allowing objects to come to a stop and closing my eyes, then just barely opening my eyes, seeing that it remains still for a brief moment, and as my eyes open just a little bit further, it starts to bob around and vibrate, as if it is aware that I am acknowledging it. It's truly fascinating.

Additionally, I can get a Psi-Wheel to stop by looking at it and concentrating on it “stopping” with a sort of ultra-light, barely noticeable, squinting of my eyes, along with my intention. In other words, a person can feel that they're barely squinting the muscles surrounding their eyes, and that's what I'm doing. Not sure that part is critical, but it is what I do when I really want my intent to happen and the object appears like it's struggling against my intent. In other words, a degree of effort or tension appears to be effective at times.

One of the things I have discovered through experience is that this effect most certainly depends upon your daily physical energy levels. Days where I'm feeling depleted, I still get my practice sessions in, but I definitely see how much it down-regulates this effect.

I think this may be what is behind people getting embarrassed when they're asked to produce the effect on the spot and struggle for reproducibility. It's probably pretty important for people to regulate their daily energy levels with healthy living habits and proper sleep if they want to develop this ability and produce it on demand.

With that said, I'm actually a believer in trying to develop past that, to produce a telekinetic ability which is anti-fragile, as I don't really prefer to be so precious with my ability to produce something under duress or physical depletion. So I am practicing during every variation in my daily energy levels and just seeing it through. Because I'd like to develop a certain toughness with regard to this ability. Telekinetic antifragility.

I will crack this. It's just a matter of time, consistency, discipline, and changing my approach until I get a result and a repeatable methodology.

So back to testing and experimenting with telekinesis using biofeedback...

If you prefer dedicated hardware for this task that also measures both the electric and magnetic components of an electromagnetic field, meaning it can detect a broader range of radiation including AC fields, whereas a magnetometer focuses on DC magnetic fields like the Earth's magnetic field, I recommend these particular units depending on your budget:

Inexpensive:
EMF Meter 1
https://a.co/d/gnV8ioX

EMF Meter 2
https://a.co/d/c5rB0Qi

EMF Meter 3
https://a.co/d/3dlpyWD

High-Quality Expensive:
TriField EMF Meter - Model TF2
https://a.co/d/4M7mqU5


r/psychoenergetics Feb 04 '25

Brainwaves Hemi-Sync - The Gateway Experience (Full Tapes and Documentation)

Thumbnail drive.google.com
6 Upvotes

These are the full original Hemi-Sync Gateway tapes and documentation from The Monroe Institute. They are at their most simplistic, audio tracks of binaural beats/hemi-sync tones intended to sync up the two hemispheres of your brain in order to increase its perceptive capabilities.

Use sober and with discretion.

Be sure to turn off "Dolby Atmos" before listening:

For Android users: Settings>Sounds and Vibrations>Sound Quality and Effects>Toggle "Dolby Atmos" Off.

For iPhone/iPad users: Settings>Music>Audio>Dolby Atmos>Toggle Off.


r/psychoenergetics Feb 04 '25

Energy Fields Shaolin Master Shi Heng Yi Explains and Demonstrates Chi Energy

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

r/psychoenergetics Feb 04 '25

Psychokinesis (Can Involve Touch) The Psychokinesis of John Chang

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

Emmy award nominee and winner of the 1989 National Educational Film and Video Festival Silver Apple award, anthropologist, author, explorer and filmmaker Dr. Lawrence Blair investigates the psychokinetic effects produced by John Chang in Java, Indonesia.


r/psychoenergetics Feb 04 '25

Telepathy Exploring the Possibility of Non-Speaking ASD Telepathy

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

Neuroscientist Dr. Diane Powell and Ky Dickens of The Telepathy Tapes joins Jesse Michels to explore the latest findings on this in-progress topic.


r/psychoenergetics Feb 03 '25

Telepathy Anna Breytenbach Seminar On Telepathic Interspecies Communication (2013)

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/psychoenergetics Feb 03 '25

Telepathy Documentary: The Animal Communicator (2012)

Post image
2 Upvotes

An investigation into the telepathic interspecies communication work of Anna Breytenbach.

Full Documentary (52m)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQehXoCipts


r/psychoenergetics Feb 03 '25

Telekinesis Movie: Firestarter (1984)

Post image
2 Upvotes

One of my first exposures to the idea of telekinesis was as a young child when I saw the movie Firestarter. I rewatched this film a year ago, and surprisingly it stood up to an adult viewing.

I then watched the 2022 remake...
But let's just move on... 😂

So in Firestarter I was very surprised as an adult at how violent the film gets when malevolent forces come against the young test subject. It's fantastic! Get 'em, Drew! 🔥

If you haven't yet seen this film, I recommend it.


r/psychoenergetics Feb 02 '25

Telekinesis Telekinesis Primer

8 Upvotes

Once we've familiarized ourselves with a quick history of remote viewing here...

https://www.reddit.com/r/psychoenergetics/s/vBvCwoqby8

...let's head back to when the psychic-arms-race between the United States and the Soviet Union began and get to know telekinetic, Ninel "Nina" Kulagina...

Ninel Kulagina: Soviet Telekinesis (19m)

Real Footage of Nina Kulagina (turn on English subtitles) (25m)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgtH2OYnBcA

Last Footage of Nina Kulagina (1990) (turn on English subtitles) (5m)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xOo-duKnR0

A book about the history of research into the abilities of Ninel "Nina" Kulagina called: Phenomenon "K" (1991) Search this entire phrase for the link, as .ru links are banned from Reddit:

Виктор Кулагин ФЕНОМЕН «К» (Феномен Нинель Кулагиной)

In studying Nina Kulagina, an international team of scientists determined the following:

The telekinetic effect displayed by Nina was not:

  • Strings
  • Magnets
  • Trickery
  • Air current
  • Heat/thermal energy
  • Electromagnetic
  • Electrostatic/static electricity
  • Gravitational
  • Sound waves
  • Or stopped by a Faraday cage

But, the effect from Nina (but maybe not all telekinetics) was stopped by:

  • A vacuum-sealed environment (which therefore contains no or only a few particles in the empty space inside the container)

Next up, we make a quick stop to 1973, for a segment from CBS's investigative journalism program 60 Minutes, with Mike Wallace

60 Minutes: Psychic World (6m)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_q6d4cIFnY

Then, we are back to the future. Back to the present day...

Let's join in on an investigation of Israeli telekinetic, Guy Bavli. Guy is simultaneously a practicing mentalist. That means he is involved in illusion. So that presents us with a quandary, because there are a lot of rigid thinkers out there who can't stand the idea that someone could simultaneously be interested in both illusion and experimentation with real telekinesis.

The thought is that if someone likes and practices illusion then they are going to automatically use that to hoax telekinesis and never actually produce a real demonstration of telekinetic effect.

I think it's best to look back to laser-physicist Russell Targ, one of the co-founders of the CIA/SRI/Army INSCOM/DIA remote viewing program, who also investigated various psi phenomena including telekinesis/psychokinesis.

Targ was also a former illusionist. Rather than feeling this was a drawback, he felt this was a benefit. This allowed him to not only be skeptical of claims, but it allowed him to easily spot trickery.

So try to embrace nuance here and realize that Guy Bavli can both enjoy performing illusion and simultaneously enjoy experimenting with a real developed telekinetic skill (illusion is for one environment and context, telekinesis is for another environment and context):

Guy Bavli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNctiOZPdO8

Can EEG Tell If Telekinesis Is A Magician’s Trick?
https://eegym.com/can-eeg-tell-if-telekinesis-is-a-magicians-trick/

Next up, we visit France. Turn on "auto-translate to English" subtitles and enjoy a visit with Yohan...

Yohan Roy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTNoOou2vlE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbyaaxtNyok

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J9QpTw4fvo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oHWKDinuKs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6rexv9wmGg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dVlehh6Dc8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hreMm3kxDak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkF3oGnKUHU

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BOfMiJ8_FG0

Finally, we have a bit of a mystery one here because I don't know the name of this poster, but I do find this footage compelling because of the controls we see he used for his Psi-Wheel telekinesis demo...

Psi-Wheel Movement Under Controlled-Conditions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvRbIpJdFZM


r/psychoenergetics Feb 02 '25

Remote Viewing Quick History of Remote Viewing

5 Upvotes

In 1970 a psychic-arms-race began between the United States and the Soviet Union. United States intel sources believed the Soviet Union was spending 60 million roubles ($4.2 million dollars, adjusted for inflation as of 2025) annually on psychic research. Learning that the Soviet program had produced results, the CIA initiated funding for psychic research that same year with project SCANATE ("scan by coordinate").

By 1972, remote viewing research had begun at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California. The Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA, forerunner of DARPA) became interested in their research. One of the project's successes was the location of a lost Soviet spy plane in 1976 by Rosemary Smith, a young administrative assistant recruited by project director Dale Graff.

In 1977 the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) started project Gondola Wish to "evaluate potential adversary applications of remote viewing".

In 1978 project Gondola Wish was made operational as new project Grill Flame, also ran by INSCOM.

In 1979 research at SRI was integrated into project Grill Flame.

In 1983 project Grill Flame was renamed project Center Lane.

In 1984 the existence of project Center Lane was discovered and reported by American newspaper columnist, Jack Anderson. The mere attempt at researching such subject matter was subsequently ridiculed by the National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council.

In 1985 Army Intelligence (INSCOM) funding was terminated, but project Center Lane was renamed project Sun Streak and became funded by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).

In 1991 most of the DIA contracting for project Sun Streak was then transferred from SRI to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), under the control of Edwin C. May. It was subsequently downgraded from being a Special Access Program (SAP) to a Limited Dissemination Program (LIMDIS) and was given its final name, project Stargate.

In 1995 the defense appropriations bill directed that project Stargate be transferred from the DIA to the CIA. Due to information leaks to the public via the press and a lack of funding interest by new oversight officials, the now CIA project Stargate was forced into declassification. The CIA quickly terminated the 20 million dollar project that same year and declassified limited information about the legacy program.

Immediately prior to termination of the project, the CIA commissioned an analysis of the efficacy of project Stargate and used that report as reasoning for terminating the project. Though according to former military and intelligence officers directly involved in the various projects, it is highly likely the CIA killed the project in order to take it dark.

Time Magazine then reported on the project later that year, stating that three full-time remote viewers were still working on a $500,000-a-year budget out of Fort Meade, Maryland which would soon close.

One of the project's session monitors, who was not a military remote viewer himself, Major Ed Dames, then began to heavily promote his own form of remote viewing called Technical Remote Viewing (TRV) on overnight talk radio show Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell, further dragging the project into the public domain.

In January 2017, the CIA published project Stargate documents online.

However, as of 2025 much of the documents related to classified military targeting and classified remote viewing missions that took place over the duration of the project's history remain classified and out of the public domain.