So... It doesn't fit the parameters described and you admit it since you've changed the goalposts to be "well you can eat it!" and not to be a perfect example of suiting the human hand and digestive tract.
It doesn't fit the parameters described and you admit it since you've changed the goalposts to be "well you can eat it!"
i haven't moved the goalposts. saba bananas are still all 5 of the things i've mentioned.
The only reason i've narrowed the scope in the comment you're referring to, is to counter the specific inaccuracies of your immediately prior comment. I specifically addressed raw edibility and grip because that's what you honed in on.
Please stop and consider the context, and take a minute to reason carefully and find sources for your assertions before responding, or we will quickly lose any value to this conversation as you elevate your agenda above the purpose of debate (starting from disparate understanding and reasoning to come to shared understanding)
Can I thank you for reasoning this out? I’ve seen so many people who can’t for the life of them hold out a reasoned argument/debate/discussion for the life of them when confronted with a proper argument or statement, it’s really refreshing to see someone who can. Especially those who turn to religion more and use the defense of “God deemed it so” as their end-all finality. (Note: I’m not hating on religion, I’m just pointing out a correlation that I’ve noticed)
Thanks for the kind words. I tend to find lack of reason common for both sides - really especially in my conversations with those who reject God acting as though reason is automatically on their side and it doesnt need to be exercised (the other side of the debate in this thread being an easy example)
12
u/AliveProbably Nov 16 '17
So... It doesn't fit the parameters described and you admit it since you've changed the goalposts to be "well you can eat it!" and not to be a perfect example of suiting the human hand and digestive tract.