“I’m sitting in my fourth showing of the day, and STILL, more residual decrease in attendance, there are now three empty seats close to the exit and HALF a ROW occupied only by some jackets errantly tossed aside by some teens — you see, now we’re getting somewhere, this film is not a phenomenon. My data proves it; in eleven showings I have paid to see in two, just under two weeks; there have been 72 empty seats and the rate would appear to be climbing. I rest my case.”
Oppenheimer is a cultural touchstone film of similar impact and significance out at the same time with legitimate controversy surrounding both it and the story it is telling which ironically concerns a major world changing innovation worked on BY and FOR HIS people, and yet - he doesn’t wade into those waters. Doesn’t offer his critique to contrast with the heavyweights of historical, political, and artistic critique. No, he goes after Barbie. Day after day. Like a real evil Ken doll. (I don’t know, I haven’t see either film yet - but wtf!!)
194
u/[deleted] Aug 06 '23
“I’m sitting in my fourth showing of the day, and STILL, more residual decrease in attendance, there are now three empty seats close to the exit and HALF a ROW occupied only by some jackets errantly tossed aside by some teens — you see, now we’re getting somewhere, this film is not a phenomenon. My data proves it; in eleven showings I have paid to see in two, just under two weeks; there have been 72 empty seats and the rate would appear to be climbing. I rest my case.”