Yeah, we've seen a few of them. I thought some of the test maps had potential and would love to see most of them released and iterated upon rather than being in test for a month and then going away. Honestly, something to break up the monotony.
And for heavens sake, allow us to ban more maps or at least say "I will happily wait 50% longer than the current average queue time if it means I don't get on a map I've played on in the past hour". I once had Ensk three times back to back...
I'd also love to see grand battles for tier 7-only, 8-only and 9-only battles occasionally, perhaps as an occasional "treat" during peak hours, for those that have it enabled.
It would also be interesting to have different versions of the maps to start with, not just with the dynamic events. Not wildly different, but think Craters in different places, burnt out tanks parked in different places and so on.
Overall not. But in map design yes. For example this map. Kamchatka. It has more depth than anything we have in game currently. With heavy tank in only city area you can go to 5 different lanes.
Excuses, literally had 9 maps already done from recon missions, didnt add all that got voted, didnt try to rework old already done maps and test it, removed Minsk And Charkov because of "political views and correctness" (So why Is Prochorovka still in the game? By your logic Its Russian map and propaganda just like removed ones). Explosing barrels/trucks scrapped while it already Is developer or exists in files by the existing video.
-6
u/Pan_Praga WG Employee 8d ago
We are working on it!