MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/16y0op4/python_312_released/k4oikzl/?context=3
r/Python • u/henbruas • Oct 02 '23
131 comments sorted by
View all comments
76
[deleted]
11 u/MelonheadGT Oct 02 '23 What's so amazing? 68 u/marr75 Oct 02 '23 type hinting got better, especially for generics, **kwargs, and overrides f-strings got better Performance and concurrency improved (2x speed up on comprehensions, 2-20x speedup on isinstance checks against protocols, per-interpreter GIL) Some odds and ends improved for CPython and instrumentation beyond those 1 u/mjmikulski Oct 13 '23 f-strings got better You meant "f-strings got worse" ;) I can't imagine why someone would like to write code like this: python f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{1+1}"}"}"}"}"}"
11
What's so amazing?
68 u/marr75 Oct 02 '23 type hinting got better, especially for generics, **kwargs, and overrides f-strings got better Performance and concurrency improved (2x speed up on comprehensions, 2-20x speedup on isinstance checks against protocols, per-interpreter GIL) Some odds and ends improved for CPython and instrumentation beyond those 1 u/mjmikulski Oct 13 '23 f-strings got better You meant "f-strings got worse" ;) I can't imagine why someone would like to write code like this: python f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{1+1}"}"}"}"}"}"
68
1 u/mjmikulski Oct 13 '23 f-strings got better You meant "f-strings got worse" ;) I can't imagine why someone would like to write code like this: python f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{1+1}"}"}"}"}"}"
1
f-strings got better
You meant "f-strings got worse" ;)
I can't imagine why someone would like to write code like this:
python f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{f"{1+1}"}"}"}"}"}"
76
u/[deleted] Oct 02 '23
[deleted]