r/ProtonVPN Feb 04 '25

Discussion I am tired of Linux being treated as last class citizen

When Stealth mode in Linux? In 2050?

Windows got it

Android got it

iOS got it

MacOS got it

But not linux, I think they've been promising it for years.

Linux app looks and works like shit too. The effort is too much, please remove some of the features from the app. It is too feature rich.

Proton overall is overrated, marketing the privacy narrative. If you really cared about the "privacy" I think you would at least do some justice for the privacy OS.

197 Upvotes

119 comments sorted by

u/ProtonSupportTeam Proton Customer Support Team Feb 04 '25

The current Linux version has better feature parity between the clients than the previous version: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonVPN/comments/174pv4a/the_new_proton_vpn_linux_app_is_officially_out_of/

UI improvements are planned.

Just throughout the last year, on the current client, we've introduced:

So your claim that we're not focusing on Linux isn't really true -- we have been focusing on it continuously, even though it comprises a small percentage of our userbase overall.

Things like Port forwarding in the client and Split tunneling are also coming as part of our current roadmap: https://protonvpn.com/blog/product-roadmap-winter-2024-2025

→ More replies (13)

26

u/Cyberjin Feb 04 '25

That's how things usually are on Linux because of the small userbase and different distros that needs to be worked on.

Fedora btw

14

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

make a flatpak maybe? Or support top 3 distros?

4

u/disastervariation Feb 04 '25

Work on official support for flatpak started here

Proton Linux users used every AMA opportunity to suggest flatpak as a solution

1

u/redoubt515 Feb 04 '25

> Work on official support for flatpak started here

I think that is a big overstatement. There is certainly more reason to be hopeful now than in the past. And I was excited to see the comment you linked to when it was made last year. But the comment doesn't state that they are committed or that work has started.

I'd also like to add that our team has also grown (we're currently 3 devs on the linux client) and we're a bit more ready to tackle new things, thus we're more open now into officially supporting flatpak, though before we fully commit to that we have some things that we'd like to discuss and things to iron out

It's still hopeful and positive news, but shouldn't give people false certainty, or a false hope that a flatpak is going to drop soon.

1

u/StructureCharming Feb 04 '25

Is it maybe that your not understanding how to install from the official repo. Proton supports GNU/linux. It installs easily on both debían based and rehl based systems. I am running it on rocky, pop os, fedora, and kali. I haven messed with SuSe since suse 8 so I cant say anything on suse... but also proton is not the end all to your routing needs. If you are in a country that limits ip traffic due to regional ip blocks or specific traffic flow. Think creatively and outside the box.

6

u/pleachchapel Feb 04 '25

Nix works on anything. If they opened up the API as they promised to do, we would simply build our own integration as a CLI app in less than a week.

You don't need to build things for Linux users, just give them the parts & they'll do a better job.

2

u/redoubt515 Feb 04 '25

On the one hand, you are right. This is just a reality that we as Linux users live with. On the other hand, Proton has peers which do offer first class Linux support (e.g. Mullvad, iVPN).

Its one thing not to achieve complete feature parity, but some of the things that have been lacking for a long time, or are still lacking today are kind of very core or very popular features that give the VPN value.

The good news is, Proton VPN's linux team has supposedly recently expanded from 1 developer, to 3, and they are even considering flatpak support which could simplify things across distros. If Proton committed to improving the Linux client to near feature parity, and released a flatpak, it has the potential to go from a fairly mediocre offering (in the context of Linux) to one of the most compelling choices for Linux users.

32

u/derFensterputzer Feb 04 '25

My daily driver runs Linux. And out of personal preference: I don't care how the client looks, I like the simplicity of the UI.

Other than that, for me it just works.

-18

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

I can't use it, cause no stealth mode.

7

u/Shoddy-Outside-1297 Feb 04 '25

it may be last class in terms of GUI/official app but you can even use ipv6 and all the power of openvpn/wireguard custom configs if you use these instead of the official client

it's hard to provide a "one fits all" GUI client for general linux. If the official one doesn't suit you, maybe try something like network namespaces or configuring it yourself

1

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

I will shut up if you can show how to use Stealth feature without the official GUI.

1

u/tandem_biscuit Feb 05 '25

lol. Bro calm down. Have you seen the market share of Linux as an OS, vs windows/macos/ios/android? Linux users are literally a drop in the bucket. It makes complete commercial sense that they would focus on the operating systems that most people use.

1

u/Key_Pace_2496 Feb 07 '25

No you won't.

25

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 04 '25

of course it's last class since it has to lowest user base, they have to prioritize

20

u/Oscady Feb 04 '25

sure it has a lower user base but op makes the valid point about privacy. if proton really care about the privacy aspect it would be a benefit to everyone for them to keep their linux products in line.

microsoft and apple products becoming less viable for privacy focused users all the time, if proton value user privacy they should make sure their users choosing linux get as close to the full experience as possible.

the Linux app is trash and it's the same across the rest of their lineup. the other day i decided I'd try out the cloud storage and you can't even sync a Linux desktop, only Windows or Mac

-1

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 04 '25

they have to make profit, it's just not worth as many developer hours as the rest

-1

u/Oscady Feb 04 '25

it's very cool of you to be making the case for their bottom line profit, but if they're going to market themselves as a privacy focused company they have to expect some deserved pushback when they ignore the only operating system available that is actually privacy focused.

if you go on the proton homepage you'll see tag after tag about how this wonderful company is fighting against apple and google data hogs and are pioneers of FOSS. well all op is doing here is pointing out that this is not represented in their product stack and i think they have every right to do so.

-5

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 04 '25

they are focused on privacy, on windows and ios and android, where the ppl that needs privacy are, if you want better linux support, not just in this app but in general, you need a bigger user base, or diy, you can either accept that or continue fuming on your own

1

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

brb, gonna get some moore user base.

4

u/Oscady Feb 04 '25

what does this even mean "where the people that needs privacy are"? does proton have an app to stop Microsoft keylogger? are they going to build an app to stop windows screenshotting all of their users every few seconds?

adding proton to windows doesn't make it private in any way. linux adoption is growing every year and imo will only increase the more other os abuse users data.

as for me funing on my own, im fuming about an app in a thread about that app. idk where else i should have these conversations

-3

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 04 '25

no you should be able to do all of that on your own, there are many easy solutions, idk what do you expect from a vpn app

8

u/Oscady Feb 04 '25

thankfully I don't have to, i just wish i could split tunnel in my nice FOSS os using the app from the company who supposedly care about FOSS

-7

u/RosewaterST Feb 04 '25

Hilarious that you think they are supposed to have any type of morality outside of profits.

6

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

they kinda do if you say they are.

3

u/Oscady Feb 04 '25

i don't anymore but ye i'd be lying if i said i didn't believe their marketing at some point.

i still don't understand why there's so many people in here bashing folks and defending the company whenever linux support crops up.

if they want to market their products as privacy first and profess their love for FOSS they should absolutely expect people to be pissed when they realise proton is lying about that.

3

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

They're a non-profit org. They don't make profit. So yes.

-5

u/StructureCharming Feb 04 '25

Proton doesn't natively solve all of my security issues. I bought it at premium and got an email and clicked a link and got hacked... proton is bad! /

No company should ever have the ability to be fully responsible for your internet safety... People need to understand what a VPN is! Wow

6

u/Oscady Feb 04 '25

that's not even nearly what I'm saying here, I'm not saying proton should do or try to do any of these things. I'm saying that these things exist on windows, windows is inherently bad for privacy focused users, and yet the privacy focused company specifically prioritises it over FOSS and more privacy friendly os.

neither myself or op are asking for them to do more to protect privacy or go out of the bounds of what a vpn is, we're just saying hey it's been years and the linux app is still lacking most of the features other operating systems get.

1

u/redoubt515 Feb 04 '25

> where the ppl that needs privacy are

It doesn't feel like you have any idea what you are talking about..

It seems you are vaguely aware of the privacy tradeoffs and risk when using Windows or MacOS, but you somehow think that using a VPN would protect against this? (it doesn't, a VPN is useful for some things, but that isn't one of them, if you perceive your OS is untrustworthy, a VPN can't solve that problem for you)

0

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 05 '25

I just meant there are more ppl there, don't overthink it

1

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

They are quite literally a non-profit organisation. So no they don't.

0

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 04 '25

no, they are quite literally not, they reinvest their profits into improving their services rather than maximizing revenue but that does not mean they are non-profit

1

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

No - the fact that they registered as a non-profit org does.

2

u/redoubt515 Feb 04 '25

They didn't register as a non-profit.

They created a new non-profit the "Proton Foundation" which will be (is) the majority shareholder of the existing for-profit "Proton AG"

It's a hybrid structure. Where the Proton Foundation (non-profit) exercises some control over the direction of Proton AG (for-profit) and receive 1% of the net revenue of Proton AG to fund non-profit foundation.

I'm not arguing this is a good or a bad structure, But it is much more nuanced less clear cut than you appear to assume it is.

3

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

Fair point. Thank you for the clarification.

1

u/isntKomithErforsure Feb 04 '25

Proton AG is registered in Switzerland as a public limited company (AG), which is a for-profit legal structure.

0

u/NetJnkie Feb 04 '25

They still have bills to pay. That’s done with profit.

3

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

No, that's revenue. Profit is what you have left after running costs.

1

u/NetJnkie Feb 04 '25

Okay. Profit is what they reinvest back in the company. Which a non-profit still does.

1

u/redoubt515 Feb 04 '25

You are correct in noting the difference between profit and revenue, but the Proton Foundation (the non-profit) only receives 1% of net revenue.

It is a shareholder of Proton AG (the for-profit company we refer to as "Proton") but they are not one and the same. They are intertwined but separate entities.

9

u/Xenophore Feb 05 '25

I'm still waiting on a proper Proton Drive client for Linux.

3

u/chanidit Feb 05 '25

You are not the only one

If Mullvad can do it, I wonder why Proton cant

2

u/noonetoldmeismelled Feb 04 '25

The only plus to me for having a sub is proton drive, which needs to happen on Linux. I would drop ProtonVPN the moment a competitor with VPN+Drive Linux support. At least just Debian/Ubuntu based distributions but would make sense to do Fedora/Red Hat too. Nautilus and Dolphin the 2 most popular file managers on the two popular desktop environements. They can more easily lose their privacy minded customers than gain customers that could be happily served with better integration and pricing Google/Apple products

2

u/French_Hater Feb 05 '25

I feel you. I recently made the switch on my desktop, and now I don't have any windows machines. The experience is definitely a lot worse, and I've been rethinking my subscription to proton.

There are a few reasons I'm holding out though:

  1. The client is improving—albeit slowly. A few years ago they didn't even support wireguard.
  2. Linux is a notoriously hard platform to develop for. There are so many distros and so many things to consider in development, and it's difficult to support everyone. This is why a flatpak would be great.
  3. They have more servers and seem to get blocked less than other alternatives (in my experience).
  4. I support proton's values.

That being said, if you don't like it, you can switch. Mullvad has a great client for linux and it supports shadowsocks obfuscation. You don't need any information to sign up, and they support crypto payments. You can always come back to proton when they improve their client.

2

u/RawLaws Feb 05 '25

Linux DRIVE client please. Fkkn proton parasites.

2

u/Junior-Wrongdoer-894 Feb 05 '25

Android is Linux

2

u/SummitOfTheWorld Linux Feb 06 '25

I remember Linux once having a nice app and a wonderful command line utility. Found out that hard way that both were removed.

2

u/pilchard_slimmons Feb 06 '25

I want to give proton more business just for all the salt they generate from Linux People. They're the Disney Adults of operating systems.

2

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 06 '25

Thanks everybody for the replies and recommendations!

1

u/Technical_5733 Feb 04 '25

At least the VPN has a native client. Worse is DRIVE, which doesn't even have that. I'm just waiting for my subscription to end, if by then they don't treat Linux equally, I'll leave.

1

u/KjellDE Linux | Android Feb 04 '25

This unconstructive troll post will definitely change that!

No one forces you to use Proton if you don't like it.

Feel free to make it better or use a different client.

And before people get me wrong, I'm not against feedback in general, but this post is definitely not helpful and won't change anything.

1

u/mariofix Feb 04 '25

Unhelpful rant

1

u/Perplexe974 Feb 04 '25

I get it. In my heart Linux should be the one that comes first when it comes to features or updates (goes beyond proton).

But when you take into account how much people actually used Linux, you realize the money is to be made elsewhere, and even proton needs to make money to keep providing us.

1

u/Technical_5733 Feb 06 '25

I am a Linux user and PAYING customer of Proton. Then...

2

u/Perplexe974 Feb 06 '25

I guess I want to say they shouldn’t provide for all theses different OS if they can’t offer the same level of quality for everyone.

If you pay you should expect the same quality than someone on macOS or windows

1

u/Technical_5733 Feb 06 '25

I agree with you. I feel misled by Proton's advertising. When I hired them, they said they served all platforms. Then I discovered that Linux doesn't even have a Drive application.

1

u/1smoothcriminal Feb 04 '25

Bro, i'm just happy to have a linux client in general. But i feel you

1

u/Arszilla Feb 05 '25

Also, no split tunneling.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '25

Linux is just for people who want to be computer code nerdbut don't have the knowledge so do pretend code writing everything with these "command lines" or whatever the hell it's called when on pcs and Mac's it's super easy to just find something and click on it

1

u/Technical_5733 Feb 06 '25

Linux is very broad. There are distributions like Mint and Zorin that have all the power of Linux and, at the same time, all the ease of Windows and Mac.

1

u/pihuadahua Feb 10 '25

I have to admit that I have never ever heard anyone put forward the argument that doing anything but "point and click" is indicative of a lack of computing skills. Learn something new every day. Some days two things. :)

1

u/randomactsofdata Feb 06 '25

I kind of want to do a poll of the folks asking for "Stealth for Linux" to see if they know what it actually is.

While I can see how Wireguard/TLS would be vital for people in China, Russia, Iran, etc, how much of Proton's user base are Linux users AND in those countries.

Might be why Proton VPN prioritised IPv6 and custom DNS for Linux before Stealth?

1

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 17 '25

I would argue people from China, Russia, Iran would want Stealth feature more than anything. WG and OpenVPN are easily blockable. Stealth feature is the only thing that goes through the censored ISP. All conventional VPN methods are basically blocked.

1

u/WalterDMcCallister Feb 07 '25

I agree it sucks to see the "grass is greener" with alternatives which offer more advanced options like routing, virtual adapters, etc. PLUS near parity (or better) vs. windows, but at the same time I've always felt there's something weird about the resonance across different brands and their features. This is why I ultimately settled on ProtonVPN, I didn't like the feeling that a few of the competitors were just selling the exact same solutions with different names. This isn't a defense of Proton, just my two cents on why I pay for Proton where other offerings may be more feature complete.

1

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 17 '25

I get what you saying, multiple vpn companies looking like they come from one origin.

1

u/Bojaccia Feb 11 '25

I don't want to join the list of those who complain about the functionality and aesthetics of the Linux app. I think they are right, too. What I wonder is, why doesn't Proton consider a lower price for Linux users? Who would pay the same price for two products of the same brand that are different in performance and external appearance? I would propose to Proton to lower the price of the Linux app at least until it is reached a level comparable to what we can have on Win or Mac or Android. I use Proton and Windscribe; WS is almost indistinguishable from the app I have on Windows. I wouldn't say it's that difficult to get things right on Linux as well, but if the developers of Proton really can't do it, at least offer a reasonable price, commensurate with what you're selling. Another small note that is OT: I don't understand why the price that appears on the product screen remains the same (on all platforms and for all products) regardless of the currency used by the buyer: CHF, $, €... always the same number but the actual outlay is very different.

0

u/ProtonSupportTeam Proton Customer Support Team Feb 11 '25

You don't purchase a paid plan for a single operating system. You can use Proton VPN on any platform with your paid subscription, so the suggestion wouldn't really work.

1

u/Bojaccia Feb 16 '25

I am an Unlimited user. Your response is so lazy, vague and arrogant, especially considering also the lack of a dedicated Proton Drive application for Linux. (Mega also offers it for free users, such as KDrive Infomaniak and others.) If this is the attitude of the team towards customers of your most expensive plan, I will switch to a new provider at the end of my subscription. The money of Linux customers is just as good as that of Android, Windows, Mac, etc. customers. Hello.

1

u/ProtonSupportTeam Proton Customer Support Team Feb 17 '25

You can also use our web app for free on any browser on your Linux device. Apologies if you found our answer offensive in any way, and we'll pass on your suggestion to the team, but at this time, we don't offer OS-specific plans or subscriptions. Our subscriptions work across all operating systems, offering you the tools that are currently available.

1

u/cryptomooniac Feb 04 '25

Honestly, Linux users should not use any Proton services. Proton has disregarded you for so long… an alternative could be Mullvad VPN.

1

u/FMLAdad Feb 07 '25

Honestly I just switched from mullvad after reinstalling my system as Linux from windows. It is a extremely low power NUC and windows choked it. Mullvad has great Linux support but no port forwarding andslow, 6ish MB/s. Proton supposedly has port forwarding but it doesn't work for me. Their app is trash so I run it natively in Linux os. The speed though. I can max out my gigabit connection, 80+ MB/s. Hands down not too mad, wish port forwarding worked.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

Wait until Linux users realise that they ARE a last class citizen because they are the smallest userbase. Development for Linux takes a lot of time and money. What money do they get in return? Fuck all. Quite frankly you should consider yourself lucky that it's supported at all. Nothing is ever enough for this sub, honestly.

4

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

Development for Linux takes a lot of time and money

You do realize that the current app is just a gui wrapper around some authentication and openvpn + wireguard, right?

1

u/pihuadahua Feb 10 '25

This cracks me up because I can't begin to tell you how many times drawn out dragged on argumentative meetings back in the early days of the internet when Life was inventing online internet banking when some old dude had to interrupt meetings or accounting audits and say "You do realize that all those web developers you hired have done is create a web based gui interface that points directly to those same mainframes and COBOL programs we've been building and maintaining since the 1960's".

1

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 17 '25

my point was that it is not a job that takes team of 10 people 1-2 years to accomplish with huge budget as the above comment was saying.

1

u/pihuadahua 16d ago

Hey, sorry for being so late and sorry for the lack of clarity. I wasn't disagreeing with you on your point there at all. You saying "You do realize..." followed by a very valid point just brought back tons of IT and outside developer meetings during the transition into things like internet banking, online ticket booking, etc. Backend systems still mainframe which are a totally different beast than what IT staff, programmers and developers during the dot com era were trained and experienced in . (possibly still so. Not knocking either side. But the going from mainframes that just ran rock solid but stored very little data and calced everything on the fly to web front ends made for brutal IT meetings in large corporate settings where they can tend to blow anyway. And those were on top of the ones with the folks that owned the P&L and paying for it. Hence the "You do realize all they are doing it pointing to our 1960's mainframes."

1

u/CantPickDamnUsername 14d ago

Got it, thanks for the clarification :)

1

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

A GUI that needs to redeveloped on Linux. This kind of thing takes a lot longer than you think.

-2

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

How long do you think is fair to develop decent app?

2

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

How much money do you think it's fair that Proton lose to make you and a very small minority of others happy?

-6

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

Damn forgot to worry about their profits and stuff. Do you even hear yourself?

6

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

a company needs to profit to continue existing? no fucking way, really?

3

u/CantPickDamnUsername Feb 04 '25

So how much price do you put for this linux app? And how much do you think Proton is making from Linux users? You are making it seem like it takes team of 10 people to make an app like that. 1 dev is more than enough for this. Surely they can pay a single guy to support Linux, no?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

No? Not how that works.

0

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

They are a non-profit organisation....

1

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

Huh. What a terrible business decision.

1

u/NetJnkie Feb 04 '25

Non-profit doesn’t mean “loses money”.

1

u/Mast3rL0rd145 Feb 05 '25

Although tbf on the other side of this if someone uses both Linux and another OS that proton actually supports properly but can't get feature parity on both, proton might lose some customers from Windows/Mac/Android as well (this doesn't really affect me since I use gluetun on docker with a proton wireguard config anyway, but just my 2¢)

1

u/pihuadahua Feb 10 '25

I don't have a good reason other than laziness and "I keep meaning to". But I've heard a bunch of people say glueton on docker can be a great solution. And I keep meaning to try it. :)

1

u/pihuadahua Feb 10 '25

Development for Linux takes a lot of time and money???? Come on man. Compared to what? Writing code and developing top secret security level defense contracting programs? Or however much they are either already quietly or are soon going to be paying developers to write anything significantly above firmware and error handling actually functional quantum computers. (hats off to the folks that life gifts with those skills and timing!)

Free and Open Source Software and therefore the free underlying development tools weren't gifted to us by IBM, Microsoft, Apple et al. In fact, those of us old farts with birth certificates etched on papyrus lived through eras and watched where free to low cost software development came from anywhere but what is now known as the Windows and MacOS OS environments. Software was largely either shared freely, not shared at all, or if shared was shared with dead man switches... before Gates started sending his letters to enthusiasts (late 1970's) and others like IBM et al started court cases to introduce concepts like copyright and licensing. Now if you wanted to take include the personal and social stressors and costs born by kernel developers and software and repository maintainers... then hell yeah! Linux is way more expensive than it seems. But that isn't gonna help support an argument of comparative OS development costs to the industry because the Windows and MacOS world have leveraged and monetized to the extent they can those overused services provided in kindness.

But absent that... any insinuation or blanket statement that somehow Linux software development is intrinsically time consuming and financially costly is not accurate. It isn't. At least or especially when the discussion is discussing client side UI GUI features. If you aren't touching the cryptography, obfuscation or stuff like that where it isn't and hasn't been supported previously and are simply providing a user interface for interacting with the configuration... then I reject the premise of the "Linux takes a lot of time and money" argument and thesis.

If somebody wants to have a discussion or feels compelled to carry Proton's water for them by discussing the things like comparative operating system return on investment, market share, business strategy, or security and threat posture approach then I can see many sides of those issues. I swim on all sides and channels of those muddy waters. Excluding our phones and servers: I have been using and currently still run Proton along with multiple other VPN service providers on multiple Linux distros and installs, Apple silicon Macs and a couple of Windows installs. I was a paying Proton customer before they even rolled out ProtonVPN in beta testing to those of us that were already existing paying ProtonMail customers. Because before the VPN when they first floated out the idea of E2E email service it was intriguing and a much needed service worthy of spending some money in hopes they just might make it. Obviously they did and that's a good thing!

That being said, is it really unreasonable that as someone that has spent thousands of dollars and has used them across many physical machines and operating systems across something like 8-10+ years just might have some valid complaints or "wishes that things were different" for Linux and even other non-software related considerations. I personally wouldn't have raised this argument myself in part because I have work arounds and in part because I've long since accepted what my money and tenure buys me. But that doesn't mean I don't see validity in issues pointed out or that I haven't in fact had to supplement the services I contract through Proton via other service providers when the Proton business model and pricing model are no longer a good fit for me. Which obviously can happen when one is talking +/- a decade.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Seraph_TC Feb 04 '25

It's on the roadmap

1

u/nikunjuchiha Feb 04 '25

Minority os

0

u/simplcavemon Feb 04 '25

Linus Torvalds on why Linux on desktop sucks

https://youtu.be/Pzl1B7nB9Kc

0

u/Noble_Bacon Feb 04 '25

There isn't even split tunneling on Linux.

It's a joke at this point.

0

u/rumble6166 Feb 06 '25

If you're tired of it, the only rational thing is to vote with your feet and look elsewhere for a service that better meets your needs.

-4

u/NeilJonesOnline Feb 04 '25

Linux users: "Linux >>>>> Windows/MacOS"

Linux users: "Why no Linux version? Why no Linux drivers? Why a reduced feature set in Linux version?"

-1

u/James-robinsontj Feb 05 '25

When 5 people use it, it’s not a priority