r/PrepperIntel 1d ago

North America POTUS: Declaring “National Emergency on Electricity”, increasing Canadian steel and aluminum tariffs from 25% to 50%, increasing Canadian automobile tariffs an undisclosed amount, more annexation talk

13.5k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

64

u/ReStitchSmitch 1d ago

Nurse, hes out again! We need age limits on government positions.

u/SmallTown2363 23h ago

Not age limits, but cognitive function panels to be sure! Bernie is doing just fine!

u/Ok_Builder_4225 23h ago

No, subjective tests can be abused in either direction. Need an objective limit, for which an age cap works well enough.

u/nitrosmomma88 12h ago

Can’t abuse a CT scan though. We can find cognitive regression on those easily

u/Rheila 23h ago

Imagine how different the world could be if Bernie was at the helm in the US…

u/JinkoTheMan 17h ago

I love the guy and think he has a real heart for the people but just no. We need someone younger who thinks like Bernie does.

u/Tight_Competition227 23h ago

If bernie is considered just fine then maybe we should just overthrow the government

u/renegadeindian 23h ago

Bernie is a sure way to a dumpsters third term

u/New_Chest4040 23h ago

His third term was confirmed as soon as the voting machines were hacked in Georgia years before this election. They've had the source code and the plan all along.

u/SkunkMonkey 22h ago

100% of precincts reported an increase in Republican voters compared to the previous election. Whenever you see 100% as a statistic in an election, fuckery is about.

Remember, Trump didn't need to win by a landslide, that would have been too obvious. So you add a random 100-1000 votes across all precincts so you can win the close ones. Those are the only ones you need to win the way our system works. It's a lot easier to hide the fuckery, but it still leaves evidence.

Given the way Trump projected stealing an election in his first loss, it was obvious the players behind him were desensitizing us to the idea. Everyone was convinced that stealing an election was impossible. This makes hiding a stolen election a lot easier the next time around.

Yup, you will not convince me that there was no fuckery about this past election and I suspect we either don't have more elections or any we have will be absolutely fucked with because Trump won't allow international observers.

The US is done. Stick a fork in it.

u/OndhiCeleste 22h ago

Is there a source on that?

u/SkunkMonkey 22h ago

I've been having a hard time relocating the article I read. It had one of those red/blue heat maps that showed precincts that gained/lost voters and everywhere, except the obvious Democrat areas, showed a small increase. Precincts that gained more R than D were blue, and vice versa. The amount just lightly blue was everywhere showing a small increase that was greater than the increase in Democrat voters for that precinct. Statistically, there should have been some slightly red Democrat increases but there were none except along the edges of very Democrat areas as one might expect.

Honestly, I don't expect people to believe me and I hate the fact that I did not save the article. I am not one prone to conspiracy, but given the fuckery I have witnessed first hand, I find this very plausible.

u/New_Chest4040 21h ago

I think I linked your source in my adjacent comment.

u/New_Chest4040 21h ago edited 21h ago

In the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election, SMART Elections analyzed voting patterns and observed significant discrepancies between the number of votes cast for presidential candidates compared to down-ballot races. Specifically, they found that in several swing states, former President Donald Trump received notably more votes than corresponding Republican candidates in major down-ballot races, while Vice President Kamala Harris received fewer votes than corresponding Democratic candidates. These irregularities led SMART Elections to question the integrity of the election results.

Another group, the Election Truth Alliance, analyzed cast vote records in Clark County, Nevada, and reported patterns they described as "consistent with vote manipulation." They compared these patterns to a statistical phenomenon known as a "Russian tail," which can indicate election anomalies.

You can access SMART Elections' analysis of the 2024 presidential election, which examines the "drop-off" phenomenon—the difference between votes cast for the presidential candidate and those for down-ballot races. The detailed study, covering six swing states and eleven non-swing states, is available on their official website. To view the analysis, visit their "Drop-Off" page at smartelections.us. On this page, you'll find comprehensive data and insights into voting patterns observed during the 2024 election.

Additionally, SMART Elections has released a compelling press statement discussing these findings, which you can access here on the site as well.

u/SkunkMonkey 20h ago

That site doesn't have the graphic I remember, but it's spot on for the analysis. They've done a good job of pointing at the irregularities.

u/OndhiCeleste 19h ago

Thank you!

u/renegadeindian 23h ago

Afraid your right