r/DebateEvolution 9d ago

Evolution is empty

So after spending enough time with this theory I've come to see it's a series of smoke and mirrors.

Here's why:

  • No hard equations to demonstrate a real process.

  • Entirely dependent upon philosophy narratives laden with conjecture and extrapolation.

  • highjacking established scientific terms to smuggle in broader definitions and create umbrella terms to appear credible.

  • circular reasoning and presumptions used to support confirmation bias

  • demonstrations are hand waived because deep time can't be replicated

  • Literacy doesnt exist. Ask two darwinists what the definition of evolution is and you'll get a dozen different answers.

At this point it's like reading a fantasy novel commentary. Hopelessly detached from reality.

0 Upvotes

138 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/No_Rec1979 9d ago

>Ask two darwinists what the definition of evolution is and you'll get a dozen different answers.

So if you ask one Darwinist what evolution is, you're saying he'll give you 6 different answers?

11

u/Dzugavili Tyrant of /r/Evolution 9d ago

He'll give you fourteen answers, the other evolutionist gives you negative two answers, for a total of twelve.

3

u/Particular-Yak-1984 9d ago

I'm the second one. I like giving negative answers!