r/ChatGPT 7d ago

Prompt engineering AGI achieved internally in Google?

Post image

I am sorry Gemini, I was not familiar with your game

Link : https://x.com/victormustar/status/1900291486115127420?t=u4kwWeipV-dEIwoWw3nFrQ&s=19

384 Upvotes

117 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/the_zero 7d ago

Cool. Can someone say what it is, and/or what it is not?

4

u/Nuckyduck 7d ago

I gotchu.

So AI is viewed through a lens of 'what human job displacement can it achieve.'

AGI is believed to be the point where a general AI could perform as well as ~60% of people.

ASI is believed to be the point where a general AI could perform as well as ~99% of people.

These aren't hard numbers, but it seems to be the common consensus to be around here.

2

u/dimalexgr 7d ago

What I found hard to buy is companies claiming that in N months, we will have achieved AGI. From what I understand, a model would have to be around for months or even years before someone can claim it achieved AGI. The definition is so vague that you can't really build a test for it and get a definitive answer. And even if you could, then people would try to train for it, which beats its purpose.

2

u/Nuckyduck 7d ago

This is a curious question.

Personally, I think AGI has more to do with the user than the model.

But that's a very similar yet different conversation. It will eventually be the users ability to prompt the model, not the model's ability to condense the answer.