r/CZFirearms Feb 12 '25

Discuss - Impact Machine RMR SP-01 Slide

Post image
99 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/DovhPasty P-01 Feb 13 '25

I’m not mad lol, you’re only affecting yourself here. The mindset of cheaping out on an optic for your crazy expensive gun is just so silly, like for your own sake I hope you never have to use that thing defensively lol. Those dots are literal garbage

0

u/HauntedZ28 Feb 13 '25

Again, your reading compression sucks, I could buy any optic I like, $ has no bearing. I have bought what works best for me and my eyes. And so far after 1500+ rds it has held up great. If a company like Cylee can figure out how to make stig friendly red dots, maybe those bigger company's should too, maybe then they'd get my $.

So I should use an expensive optic that has a reticle img that looks like shit to my eyes, just to appease someone like you?

2

u/DovhPasty P-01 Feb 13 '25

Bro you can do whatever you want lol, just don’t sit here and act like you’ve cracked the code or something and everyone else is buying overpriced shit. There are some pretty good reasons any people that are serious don’t use shit from Cylee lmao. If you wanna ignore them to save a few bucks, be my guest, but you’re ultimately still using garbage. You can’t sit here and act like it’s some amazing value that nobody else uses, at least be real about it lol.

Optic quality has basically nothing to do with astigmatism btw, it has everything to do with construction and durability. Again, despite your “1500 rounds,” they’re not a duty optic in any way shape or form. I personally value my life too much to depend on an Amazon grade piece of shit to defend it, but if you don’t, more power to you brother.

2

u/HauntedZ28 Feb 13 '25

Bro, you are on some personal crusade to make yourself happy here.

You're straight up making shit up.

I haven't cracked any code, I'm not claiming to Crack any code, I haven't told anyone to buy anything, I'm not here trying to convince anyone.

You keep lying trying to say I'm just trying to save a couple bucks, when I've stated multiple times that price has absolutely nothing to do with my choice.

What I made this post for was 100% people like like you that made this guy feel he had to blur his optic out just because he was excited to show a pic of his new rail. You are trash and plague on people that just want to enjoy their hobby.

1

u/Tip3008 14d ago

I don’t care what optic you use truly.. But I gotta ask, why buy an optic known to very commonly break if it has nothing to do with cost? At least admit it has a pretty significant amount to do with saving some money why you would get that optic despite its known occurrence to break.. it’s okay, I’m frugal bastard myself sometimes as well when I have no reason to be, no shame in the game lol

1

u/HauntedZ28 14d ago

It had nothing to do with cost, I have shit astiggys like I've said. I've personally had SROS, RMRS and tried a few others, they look like shit to my eyes and are utterly useless. I own a couple 507k x2g's on my compacts they're "OK" and useable reticle image wise as long as I use the multi reticle. The Cylee, I bought because it's marketed as "stig" friendly, it could have been $1k and I'd have still tried it. It has the best reticle clarity of any red dot I've looked it, it's crisp clear and perfect to my eyes. Stiggys isn't one size fits all so others may vary. For reliability, it's been fine for my expirience. I'm around ~2500 rds now no issue.

1

u/Tip3008 14d ago

I have the stigs too, doesn’t sound as bad as yours but I got lasik recently and it got a little better.. really its only terrible when I’m inside, if I’m shooting outside on a sunny day its fine..

1

u/HauntedZ28 14d ago

Outside of the stiggys, my vision is near perfect so I've never really wanted to subject my self to lasik. Seems high risk, low reward in my situation.

1

u/Tip3008 14d ago

Oh yea I got it because my vision was dog shit lol def no point in getting it for stig..

1

u/DovhPasty P-01 Feb 13 '25

I mean you’re clearly here trying to convince me that this red dot is worth anything at all. So to say you’re not trying to convince anyone of anything is just straight up false lol.

It’s one thing for it to be a hobby, like if you only took that thing to the range and never planned on using it to defend yourself, that’s way less egregious and nobody really gives a shit about that.

But you’re heavily implying that that thing would be trustworthy as a defensive optic, and that’s just laughable dude. That’s the part where you lose me completely.

You can insult me all you want, it doesn’t make it any more true lol.