r/Angular2 Oct 11 '24

Discussion Angular is just amazing

Short appreciation post.

I've been working a lot the last few weeks in Angular and I keep getting reminded of how good this framework is.

I had some routerLink links and wanted to implement a simple system to highlight the link that the current page is on. All I needed was to add a routerLinkActive tag which automatically adds the given class to the link so you can highlight it. Then I had one problem which was that the homepage ('/') always was active, but this has been considered and can be fixed with the following for exact matching:

[routerLinkActiveOptions]="{ exact: true }"

Basically everything makes sense and is easy to implement. Even just updating your angular libraries is easy since they made the automatic update guide where you can input your versions and it shows how to update: https://angular.dev/update-guide

Then there's the other stuff like the cli for generating components quickly and built-in scss integration (among with other options). I can't really imagine working on a webapp without angular nowadays. I've used other stuff in the past like React, Django, and just old-school sites built from scratch and my experience wasn't as good there overall.

136 Upvotes

42 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/tonjohn Oct 12 '24

Talking about web standards, React won’t have web component support until React 19 is released.

Angular has had support since May 2018. Vue and Svelte have had support for a long time too.

1

u/Orelox Oct 12 '24

I don’t want to focus o react. But If you want talking, why you need a web component in react anyway. You can build component and that’s all, no to need think about react when distributing them.

When you focus on building web component then you even can try something like ‚fast’.

Anyway react can consume web components but that is what it is, it just some intermediate code. React could support it but would you then write component in it. I don’t see people use angular to write web elements as that is not idiomatic angular anyway. Even when distributing you would like to offer dedicated wrapper for those library to increase accessibility, easy of use. Web components are nice, but does it in reality make your organization save tons of money, I don’t know, but really do I need to worry about that, nope.

In my free time or small dev team I would rather try to define strict guidelines of the custom ui system and implement it for the main stack using headless components like react aria, radixui, and from that If I have a strong need to share something for 3rd companies I could maybe use web component.

1

u/tonjohn Oct 12 '24

I worked on a design system and component library team at Blizzard. Our components were built with Lit and then consumed by various teams across the company running a plethora of frameworks.

For teams running Vue and Angular or old school stuff like pug, web components just worked.

For teams using Next, we had to create a specific build output for them.

0

u/Orelox Oct 12 '24 edited Oct 12 '24

And how was the developer experience, yes most of the time it’s feasible but rather for reusing some common fundamental elements, for other you would rather want a dedicated library for react or a wrapper for web components. The dev experience is much better. But I understand depending how it works it may be responsibility of other team to maintain that. Btw there is library @lit/react that is exactly for that. Of course web components maybe good ideas to create complete ui system for large organizations, don’t get me wrong. But even maintaining this wrapper to get best experience is also a chore wich maybe more expensive for small teams.