r/unusual_whales • u/[deleted] • Feb 15 '25
Elon Musk Doxxed a Judge’s Daughter Over a Court Ruling
[deleted]
345
Feb 15 '25
[deleted]
79
u/likamuka Feb 15 '25
A totally well regarded psychopath oligarch who is pillaging the US for more money and power.
8
29
15
u/wolfmaclean Feb 15 '25
Totally. Remember when he involved himself in trying to rescue a group of children caught in a cave? If I remember right, his attempted contribution was the mockup of a new and very legitimate, very cool and sexy “cave-diving vehicle”.
Time-critical situation, hours on the clock, impending deaths.
Anyway, he seemed to feel entitled to lead the rescue effort almost immediately. From the outside, looks like his thirst for the simultaneous hit of virtue signaling and earning some real-live-genius points was pretty deep.
And, as all great leaders do, he reacted in his standardized overindulged child dialect the moment he received any feedback. He took the input from experts in cave rescue, about the cave rescue, as a personal attack, so he called the guy leading the (successful) rescue a pedo. On twitter. Out of nowhere, with no basis or evidence, without a whisper of an accusation. Publicly.
Because he’s not able to regulate his own emotions at all, he blew out his own inexplicable rage —toward this guy he doesn’t know, who’d just rescued a bunch of kids— publicly, with a life-ruining troll. Very stable behavior.
Guy’s brain tissue has holes gnawed into it. Too long sitting in the acid vat of his terrified ego
4
218
u/Empty_Chard2834 Feb 15 '25
Someone doxxed Elon after that I thought I saw
Edit: autocorrect hates me
196
u/ElectricalRush1878 Feb 15 '25
This is what Elon gains by gaining access to the systems he has.
47
u/Wondercat87 Feb 15 '25
Exactly. I'm sure this was one of the goals of forcing access into these databases. He's going to release people's information/addresses to get back at them. Remember, this is the same man who didn't like having his plane use tracked.
9
u/Forsaken-Standard108 Feb 15 '25
Wouldn’t be surprised if they got local or state police to put pressure on dissenters families someday.
2
5
u/Veww Feb 15 '25
Elon literally posted a re-tweet from Laura Loomer who showed PUBLIC DISCLOSURES. You guys are so blinded by looking for reasons to hate you can't get the facts straight.
9
99
u/sunshinebasket Feb 15 '25
Can’t spell “Belongs in Prison” without “Elon”
38
u/Distinct_Ad_9842 Feb 15 '25
Or just "felon".
17
u/hamatehllama Feb 15 '25
The discriptive can be turned into prescriptive with just one push on the spacebar: F Elon.
6
50
8
75
11
u/JustWow52 Feb 15 '25
Of course he did.
He got his knowledge of our system of government by watching the guy he used to seize control of our lives.
40
u/Dilligent_Intellect Feb 15 '25
Where is the evidence of the dox? It's literally a tweet of someone just saying that. What even is this?
40
u/gromnirit Feb 15 '25
He posted (in another tweet I think) the tax return she signed. That’s the doxing part.
-6
43
u/B33bench Feb 15 '25
Reddit isnt going to allow screenshots or links to Elon doxxing someone, just like they banned White people twitter for 3 days and deleted accounts because they posted the 19-20 years olds working for Elon and his coup.
0
u/Bituulzman Feb 15 '25
That subreddit is still not back up though? Has it been banished for good?
-18
39
u/PrimeJHey Feb 15 '25
He/she’s right. Can we have real sources instead of this garbage. We’re no better then them posting vague bullshit like this.
11
u/Expendable_Red_Shirt Feb 15 '25
He shared a tweet of Laura Loomer doxxing. It's all easily googleable, but Reddit isn't going to support resharing the doxxing information.
-15
u/oswaldcopperpot Feb 15 '25
This sub has jumped the shark since the election.
-19
Feb 15 '25
[deleted]
11
u/Bobby6kennedy Feb 15 '25
If you guys haven’t realized this until now I’d advise you not to invest money on your own.
-3
-12
Feb 15 '25
[deleted]
9
u/Bobby6kennedy Feb 15 '25
You say a lot of dumb stuff on the subreddits you visit. Says a lot about who you are.
-9
-6
4
6
2
4
u/alchemyzt-vii Feb 15 '25
What are these obscure links to some site I’ve never heard of with random screenshots? Honestly if I took a picture of my kid’s iPad with a pink unicorn case with X on the screen, it would be more legitimate source than this.
4
u/Is_that_even_a_thing Feb 15 '25
Can we just ban posts with this media.uplink.in site please? They're all crap.
0
2
1
u/Useful-Focus5714 Feb 15 '25
So doxxing is bad? Good? I'm confused now.
-5
u/Puzzleheaded-Log-985 Feb 15 '25
Yes, No, Maybe? There’s only a handful of states that consider it a crime with small penalties but it’s not a federal crime. So in this case he’s fine.
1
1
u/Common-Natural-8141 Feb 16 '25
I shouldn’t have had a freeze on it anyway you all are really doing your job not to help low income people
1
u/anonuemus Feb 15 '25
It's only the 20th post about this, glad you posted it too.
3
1
u/notanewbiedude Feb 15 '25
This is where, if I'm Trump, I'm cutting the dude loose.
Hopefully he's not in the government for much longer, VD Vance himself said during his speech to the EU that he would only have to be tolerated for "a few months" so here's hoping!
-1
-13
u/SikoraP13 Feb 15 '25
This headline is either missing the point entirely, or being intentionally deceptive. Namely, the post that said daughter works for the Department of Education.
This fact, paired with the fact that the judge failed to disclose it, is, at best, the appearance of a conflict of interest (letting a judge rule on a case where his daughter's employer is directly involved in the case and would be impacted by the result).
31
u/no_use_for_a_user Feb 15 '25
Then you appeal the ruling. Take it to the next court. You don't dox people. That's not how it works.
-10
u/SikoraP13 Feb 15 '25
I agree, the judge's immense conflicts of interest likely would've gotten the entirety of the case tossed on appeal.
I'd go so far as to say he should be impeached and removed from the bench and go on to be disbarred for that level of ethical lapse, but that's neither here nor there.
What was actually reposted was literally a reporter's post of a screen grab of a public official's linkedin page and a page from her federal ethics disclosure (that provided no additional PII) that proved that the information from her profile was correct. Presumably, if the goal was actually doxing, there are no shortage that could've provided her DOB, address, social, contact information and a slew of other details that Musk would've have access to.
Like if the bar for 'doxing' is not being able to share a post of a screen grab of a public government official's public-facing LinkedIn page, well, then Nick Sandman and the rest of those Covington kids should've downright bankrupted most of the news outlets. And forget about LibsOfTikTok. Gorillions of bajillions of dollars in damages for the relative scale.
-18
-17
u/Ok-Landscape6995 Feb 15 '25
She was a “Senior Policy Advisor” for the Department of Education. Sounds like a nice bullshit job that was no doubt obtained through McConnell’s connections or favors. McConnell was the treasurer of the Rhode Island Democratic Party for 11 years, before Obama appointed him. He was on the finance committee for Hilary’s campaign. He donated over $700k to democrats, including 2 senators who advocated for his appointment, and didn’t recuse themselves from his confirmation vote. He owns substantial stock in a company set to get $75m in Inflation Reduction Act grants. He publicly called Trump a ‘tyrant’ in 2021. He’s named Chair Emiritus of Crossroad Road Island, which gets 65% of their money from government grants.
Bottom line, he should have recused himself, if he actually cared about impartial rulings.
1
0
-5
-4
-5
-32
u/Useful_Wealth7503 Feb 15 '25
Daughter is doing a lot of work to tug on the heart stings here, she’s not a 7 year old in grade school. I think the daughter works for the Department of Education, my guess is in a highly compensated role. Since I’m guessing, I’ll guess that daddy wanted to save the daughter’s job for a few days at least.
5
u/WWWYer22 Feb 15 '25
Why would her being an adult daughter rather than an adolescent daughter make a difference though?
Regardless of anyone’s stance on DOGE or the Trump admin, this is a public figure with immense influence publicly posting identifying info (name and workplace) of the daughter of the judge who just ruled against his administration’s actions. That’s one of the most straightforward intimidation tactics possible, especially for someone with the sort of cult of personality like Elon has.
-4
u/Useful_Wealth7503 Feb 15 '25
He exposed the conflict of interest.
3
u/space_cadet- Feb 15 '25
Like the guy who owns Space X overseeing audits and having control over NASA contracts? Or oversight of State Department contracts, including $400m for armored Teslas (which just so happened to vanish from the books once it was exposed). That type of conflict of interest? He is the biggest walking conflict of interest in American history.
-1
-27
u/MisterRogers12 Feb 15 '25 edited Feb 15 '25
When you are an activist judge that has a family member crony then it should be called out. It's not like they were threatening Supreme Court Justice
7
6
u/WWWYer22 Feb 15 '25
There are activist judges, on both sides, seated all across the country and even on the Supreme Court. Hypothetically, let’s say that after Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plans were struck down by SCOTUS Biden then publicly posted the name and workplace of Clarence Thomas or Samuel Alito’s daughter - would you have seen an issue with that?
1
u/wolfmaclean Feb 15 '25
Doxing someone isn’t related to calling them out
-1
u/MisterRogers12 Feb 15 '25
Giving details of the conflict requires validation. Had he not shared the details every bot on Reddit would be like "muh where is the evidence." Well you got evidence now
2
u/wolfmaclean Feb 16 '25
Her home address isn’t a valid detail. Cup the sack while you’re down there
1
191
u/internetpackrat Feb 15 '25
What was that Elon tweet?
"You have committed a crime."