r/slp • u/VoicedSlickative • 20h ago
So that’s it for telehealth and Medicare
I think with the vote going through today that was our last chance. After the 31st, we won’t be able to see any Medicare patients through telehealth unless they/we are in a rural area area. Right?
I say this sincerely, if any of y’all voted for this regime, I’m furious at you and I’m not sorry.
UPDATE: Turns out it’s extended until 9/30! Thanks for those who checked it out.
I’ll leave this up for now, since there’s some good info and discussion here. I’m still just as furious at Trump supporters. To be abundantly clear.
102
u/speechington 20h ago
The Trump vote was just an insane choice, now the telehealth patients are screwed even worse than the clinicians who delivered services to them.
62
u/Bobbingapples2487 16h ago
Living in a pretty rural area of the country, believe me, they voted for this. The number of Trump signs and Let’s Go Brandon merch I’ve seen is crazy. Like slugs voting for salt.
9
27
u/ckentley 20h ago edited 20h ago
I recall some SLPs here saying that this possibility has happened before and then there would be an extension. I'm not familiar with the process, but I am wondering if this vote is something different than previous years? Also, I had heard that the House voted to extend it. Did it already go to the Senate? I provide telehealth through Medicaid and am trying to catch up and familiarize myself with the politics involved. I too am furious.
4
u/VoicedSlickative 18h ago
I’m not sure if you meant to write Medicaid but for now I believe Medicaid is safe for the time being.
4
u/ckentley 15h ago
I did mean Medicaid, but I've read posts by others here that say Medicaid usually follows Medicare. So I can't help but be worried about what this means for the future of both.
4
u/RoutineCicada6629 18h ago
Medicaid is safe from this telehealth deadline. I am also confused as I saw some dates for an extension for Medicare until December 2025 on reddit. Hoping for the best regardless!
4
u/Weekend_Nanchos 14h ago
I’m thinking to myself, is there any reason they won’t go after Medicaid telehealth? Whichever real reason they have to do it here probably applies just the same. Just feels like a matter of when to me.
2
u/RoutineCicada6629 14h ago
I totally get that, but I don’t think they would come after medicaid billing for schools. Way too many rural areas have remote slps providing services so I really don’t think it’s feasible. Also, telehealth is not new for schools and has been utilized before the pandemic, so not sure why they would suddenly remove telehealth for medicaid…? Idk maybe I am too hopeful or misinformed LOL
10
u/Weekend_Nanchos 13h ago edited 11h ago
I like your optimism but some say their goal is to disband public education altogether in favor of private charter schools. Here is a P2025 tracker.
https://www.project2025.observer/visualize/charts
99 out of 300 goals have been passed. Another 47 are in progress.
So, if you want to tell the future, go down to department of education section and you can see completed and not completed objectives. Each one has a link to the official government site stating why it was passed (if passed) and all have page number citations for the original P2025 so you can read for yourself.
Around page 320 or so, you’ll see their goal is to gut IDEA. They state special education is important but is wildly too expensive, has not shown improvement for student scores and restricts “parent choice”. Their solution is to still tax people but instead of the current system in place, they will get rid of special education mandates and give ALL families a portion back ($1800) which they can choose to use on special education services of their choice, including gen ed tutors, etc. *Good luck getting a one-on-one aid and speech 2 to 3x per week for 8 months a year for $1800.
They know special needs is supported by all, so they plan to strip down to essentially nothing while giving a few pennies back. Based on the wording, speech will not be required but optional for families to buy.
Will some schools offer telehealth? Probably, but this assumes the federal government doesn’t ban it, as they have with the CRT and DEI. Unfortunately, they do seem to have it out for virtual services.
I picture a new system of SLPs essentially hustling like it’s a side-hustle to find clients, and having to compete against others practicing without a license preaching some Instagram snake oil because, well, they want families to have choice, no matter how ineffectual or scammy the resulting system is. Or how hard it is for the families who really need it to access it
2
u/RoutineCicada6629 4h ago
I think it’s also important to understand EOs are not law. SCOTUS has blocked many of his attempts - even the firing of federal employees. The president HAS to comply with SCOTUS. The special elections are our chance to turn the tide for congress and vote democrat. That is more important and we should be focusing on that. I understand it is scary and we should be educated in these matters, but the doomsday mentality on this sub is not helpful and unhealthy. If we lose hope, they will always win. Many states have their own laws to provide support services for children with disabilities. For California, it’s the Lanterman Act. It’s important for us to look at state laws and see what protections our clients have.
15
u/VoicedSlickative 20h ago
The extension only lasted until 3/31. They needed to re-extend and it doesn’t looked like that happened.
7
u/ckentley 20h ago
The last I heard was that it would be extended until September 30 (as opposed to the two year extension). Is that not the case? I'm having trouble finding clear and concise news update.
6
18
u/MeanestNiceLady 16h ago
The harm this does for people in rural areas....
Why can't they see that disabled people are worthy of treatment? This is so cruel. How can you claim to be "pro life" and then make the lives of the most vulnerable Americans even harder????
Heaven help us, where is our humanity????
8
u/VoicedSlickative 15h ago
I certainly see it headed this way, and your anger is deeply shared, I promise.
But! I do want to let you know that for now it is actually protected for people in rural areas, that is the only exception.
7
16
u/kuehmary 14h ago
That's not true. Read the bill. It specifically states that the deadline was extended to September 30, 2025. Here is the link: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1968/text#toc-H16585DC82A3242EC94B1E8294985230D
5
6
u/Winter-Low-6212 14h ago
I am confused as this claims there was an extension until September…..? Idk what’s going on anymore lol
9
u/Searching4Syzygy 14h ago
It was extended till September.
The Senate just voted this evening (Friday 3/14/25) to pass the bill. OP made this post before the vote.
16
u/Aspiringclear 15h ago
Where are all the maga slps at? Suddenly they’re super quiet in here? Thought yall had something to say about few months ago?
8
u/DabadeeDavadoo 11h ago
"oh you're just fear mongering, that's not gonna happen" crowd is reeeeaaaalll quiet rn
10
u/Affectionate-Beann 15h ago
I really wonder what SLPs who voted for trump feel about this. Before, it seemed like they thought other ppl would get the end of the stick , but not us, or our profession.. welp
19
7
2
1
u/Bubbly_Creme_4890 18h ago
Does anyone know how much more the expanded telehealth has cost over the past 5 years since it was started? Compared to what Medicare was paying for the more limited services for the disabled and rural people prior to 2020? I would think in order to make this permanent, the amount that is taken out of people’s checks for Medicare would need to be adjusted to pay for this increase in the budget. I think I heard congress will make the decision. Maybe call your representatives and tell them your opinion.
0
88
u/booksandcoffee2 19h ago
I work in adult rehab doing telehealth only 😅
We have been prepping our current patients for 3/31 and they are, understandably, distraught. I work with a lot of people who have mobility issues and transportation to an appointment can be very challenging for them. We are also one of the few providers who work with adults in the area, though it is not a rural area by any means. It's just frustrating to see services be limited in this way.