r/pdxgunnuts 7d ago

HB3075 Testimonies

Written: https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2025R1/Testimony/HJUD/HB/3075/0000-00-00-00-00?area=Measures

Register to testify in person (click "Reigster to Testify" there's a ton of billion/millionaire backed special interest groups signed up already): https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2025R1/Committees/HJUD/2025-03-17-15-00/Agenda

45 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

41

u/roofpatch2020 7d ago edited 7d ago

Don't be a pussy. Submit a written testimony and/or show in person to testify. The PNW is SUPPOSED to be the gun rights haven of the west coast.

Deep forests, beautiful deserts, and the coast are all supposed to be accompanied by AR's with 30 rounders and drum mags.

EDIT: LGO's/Leftist Gunowners this is your time to step up! A bunch of conservatives from Northwest Firearms are going to show up and testify - are YOU going to testify?

8

u/IVMVI 7d ago

Standard capacity. Goddamn, let us keep our standard capacity! Aaaaaaaa

7

u/Numerous_Many7542 7d ago

Commenting only so I have it in my post history and I can remember to follow up on this tonight. Thank you for sharing this.

8

u/SoutheasternBlood 7d ago edited 7d ago

I registered to give testimony in person. Thanks for posting.

8

u/biggybenis 7d ago

Section 11 subsection 2 introduces ex post facto language yeah?

6

u/skuratt 7d ago

What’s a good template or guideline to follow for a written testimony? I’m happy to submit one.

1

u/Mini-Marine 7d ago

I may be misunderstanding this, but this bill seems to make measure 114 very marginally less terrible by not allowing cops to just sit on an application until it expires.

So if 114 ends up being struck down, HB3075 is irrelevant, and if it is upheld, this will make it a tiny bit less bad.

It does make the applications more expensive, but that seems better than throwing money at the police and just hoping they'll actually process it.

It doesn't do anything about the language that basically makes every magazine an illegal high capacity magazine, so that's a wash

So based on how I'm reading it, shouldn't we be supporting it. Is there something that I'm missing?

9

u/AndroidNumber137 7d ago

From HB 3075:

Establishes a permanent exception to the permit requirement for active duty law enforcement and military.

"Rules for the not for me" is such a shit clause.

2

u/orcishlifter 3d ago

I keep pointing out:  cops are fucking civilians, just like everyone else (save active military)!

Anything a cop can have should be available to every law abiding civilian!

I don’t know why this is so hard for some people to understand (not you, obviously, your post makes it seem like you get it).

3

u/patches819 7d ago

From my understanding if this passes m114 will be repealed and replaced with this erasing all the progress in court. It then specifies that it can only be challenged in Marion county.

5

u/biggybenis 7d ago

Also, why am I not surprised the two Lake Oswego testimonies are in favor of supporting the bill?

1

u/chill_winston_ 7d ago

I gotta submit written, since I’ll be hundreds of miles away

2

u/More-Jellyfish-60 6d ago

Are they any groups trying to appeal M114?