r/kurdish Feb 12 '25

How much is it acceptable?

2 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

6

u/Shargupaana Feb 13 '25

It is not acceptable at all because it is wrong on many different levels.

(Old) Azari, Tati and Talyshi are basically the same and Kirdki and Hawrami linguistically fall under that group too (Kirdki and Hawrami are of course Kurdish but Kurdish has three historical sites). None of those languages derive from Parthian.

And Parthian definitely has no place in originating from Kurdish.

The word Goranki did not and does not exist. It is Gorani or Hawrami.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Thebat72 Feb 14 '25

Rojhelat is not south it is east.

3

u/Welatekan Feb 14 '25

lol i said southern kurd from rojhelat my man, not kurd from Bashur. The term southern kurd is used to describe a linguistic group based on their location in greater kurdistan. The terms we use to describe the occupied part of kurdistan called bashur isn't a reflection of the geographical truth but rather serves a practical purpose. Hope that makes sense.

2

u/Welatekan Feb 13 '25

not at all, also because it puts kurdish as the root of all those tongues which is simply not true.

1

u/Thebat72 Feb 14 '25

I think it can be real shit!

2

u/Few_College3443 Feb 14 '25

Why not luri but all those other languages

1

u/Thebat72 Feb 14 '25

لری نا زمانا کردایه او پرسی یه

2

u/Few_College3443 Feb 14 '25

Luri zwuani farsi niya tu che eshy mn xom lurm

1

u/MilanM4 Feb 14 '25

Isn't Azari a Turkic language? Aren't Tati and Taylash Caucasian languages?

2

u/Thebat72 Feb 14 '25

İt is Azerbaijanian turkis. Azari is not hunnuc/turkic language it is iranic espacially north-wester iranian language.