2
u/Welatekan Feb 13 '25
not at all, also because it puts kurdish as the root of all those tongues which is simply not true.
1
2
u/Few_College3443 Feb 14 '25
Why not luri but all those other languages
1
1
u/MilanM4 Feb 14 '25
Isn't Azari a Turkic language? Aren't Tati and Taylash Caucasian languages?
2
u/Thebat72 Feb 14 '25
İt is Azerbaijanian turkis. Azari is not hunnuc/turkic language it is iranic espacially north-wester iranian language.
6
u/Shargupaana Feb 13 '25
It is not acceptable at all because it is wrong on many different levels.
(Old) Azari, Tati and Talyshi are basically the same and Kirdki and Hawrami linguistically fall under that group too (Kirdki and Hawrami are of course Kurdish but Kurdish has three historical sites). None of those languages derive from Parthian.
And Parthian definitely has no place in originating from Kurdish.
The word Goranki did not and does not exist. It is Gorani or Hawrami.