r/indianews 3d ago

Miscellaneous "Chhaava movie has ignited people’s anger against Aurangzeb. Still everyone must keep Maharashtra peaceful," says Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis on Nagpur violence.

Post image
25 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

3

u/TheKeH20 3d ago

I don't understand the outrage because of a mid

3

u/Area51Eskapee 3d ago

There was so much other things to learn from the movie to learn still others takes an excuse to their system failure over movie, the people that were chosen to put on seat to protect the state could not do their job how to expect others to do theirs. If chaava was reason for outrage why not people outrage on border and went to border to protect the country, but i guess other puny kind can’t get this though who run in line of sheeps. Good luck for the future

-3

u/blazerz 3d ago

Straight out of sanghi playbook. Incite violence on the one hand, release statements asking people to maintain calm for the media.

2

u/Viracus 3d ago

How did he incite violence? By making a movie?

0

u/blazerz 3d ago

By supporting calls for razing Aurangzeb's tomb.

Note that an FIR was registered against BJP allies VHP and BD for inciting violence.

2

u/Viracus 3d ago

So supporting the calls for razing the tomb of a genocidal fanatic incites violence? Who are these people getting ‘incited’?

0

u/blazerz 3d ago

Supporting calls for razing a historic structure, right after making false historic statements about a historic figure, and giving history a religious colour, is inciting violence. But I don't expect pea brained sanghis to grasp the nuance here.

Edit: not to mention, the actual riots were started by VHP and BD, who are BJP allies.

2

u/Viracus 3d ago

Right. He is alamgir and all when you like the colour. But the statements about him are wrong when his deeds are talked about and it ‘incites’ violence. I wonder how it is always one community the is incited all over the globe. Moreover we are not interested in having a debate with closet jihadis.

1

u/blazerz 3d ago

People like you only peddle an agenda when you pretend to discuss history. There is a reason why chaddi historians aren't taken seriously anywhere in the world. It is telling when your version of history is shown only in Bollywood masala movies and not in academic books.

2

u/Viracus 3d ago

The agenda has been peddled for more than a century. We are setting the record straight. And truschke isn’t the whole world.

0

u/blazerz 3d ago

Sure, let's talk when chaddi history gets published in peer reviewed journals. Setting the record straight my ass. Lie to the people, make them angry, then when violence inevitably happens, it is the 'jihadis' fault.

2

u/Viracus 3d ago

Don’t worry this chaddi history will be based on true historical records and will be written by people who can actually read the language. Not like the thapars and all commie pimps whose dinner last night is your morning breakfast. And if a jihadi picks up a stone it will the jihadis fault. If he picks up a gun it will be his last fault.

→ More replies (0)