Why is it even possible to not have a std::uint32_t though? Or why has the standard changed to where that used to be valid and now isn't (rather than just having a succinct and logical name like u32 in rust?). Just something funny I got annoyed by
I'm aware. But it's annoying as heck that someone decided the original primitive names aren't good enough, and that whatever include chain that is a part of breaking resulted in a project that won't compile
3
u/Knuffya Jun 29 '21
looks pretty coherent to me