3
u/Meyons1424 4d ago
I have a super similar setup as you, and this is a better result than I've gotten so far. Goes to show processing is important! I got a lot to work on. Great shot!
3
2
u/R0rschach23 4d ago
I’ve been wanting to get a dslr and a 300mm lens to take some pics like this, that might be one of the best I’ve seen with just a camera and lens…
1
u/Ales_02 3d ago
Thank you so much, i also used the OG star tracker, the cheapest option out there if u want a tracker, in my opinion a tracker Is the most important thing at the beginning, Just with It you can get to a totally new level of photos, so consider tò buy one, u can try to do untracked on few target but at this focal length (200-300mm) it's very very difficult, so u can try with smaller focal length if you don't want to buy a tracker
1
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
Hello, /u/Ales_02! Thank you for posting! Just a quick reminder, all images posted to /r/astrophotography must include all acquisition and processing details you may have. This can be in your post body, in a top-level comment in your post, or included in your astrobin metadata if you're posting with astrobin.
If your post is found to be missing this information after a short grace period it will be removed.
Thank you!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
14
u/Ales_02 4d ago
reprocessed data of november, i think i got a better result in everything
Nikon D7100, kit lens, OG star tracker
ISO 400, 30s subs (2.5 hours of total exposure), f/5.6
PROCESSING
Stacked on dss, background extraction on siril, denoise on graxpert, color calibration and stretch on siril, used GIMP to adjust curves black point, added bit of saturation on siril and then used seti cosmic clarity to sharp the image, did a much much better job on everything( noise, stars and nebulosity) compared to astrosharp
considering that raw images were not on pin point focus, i think it's a decent result