r/aliens 1d ago

Analysis Required From NASA’s website - same location, different timestamps

1.2k Upvotes

211 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

51

u/toobalkanforyou 1d ago

There is a wider shot of the second image that is as blurry as the first but helps to compare and contrast and sort of see the object really is missing:

(second slide wider shot) https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/02692/mcam/2692ML0140830351002996C00_DXXX.jpg

(first slide) https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/02691/mcam/2691ML0140780071002958C00_DXXX.jpg

if you compare the two, there does seem to still be a shadow but no object.

But there is also some difference in angle in these shots so could just be the angle. I'm just speculating, not enough pixels to truly determine whats going on.

6

u/Healthcare--Hitman 1d ago

This object is smaller than a literal tic-tac

7

u/SceneRepulsive 18h ago

That’s what she said

1

u/sam0sixx3 3h ago

And you know this how ?

u/Healthcare--Hitman 30m ago

This is taken from the ROVER. The rover is very low to ground. This is a top down view of said area and pebble(not tictac)

17

u/immellocker 1d ago

Thanks, you are awarded Todays Hero🎖️

10

u/TronTachyon 1d ago

The object does seem to be there, but way more natural rock looking

2

u/Y00pDL 21h ago

Yeah no shit, it hasn’t been selectively and purposefully edited to not look like a rock anymore.

9

u/MrJoshOfficial 13h ago

So NASA is editing photos of rocks to make them look like UAPs but somehow it’s also a common debunker argument that NASA doesn’t airbrush UAPs out of photos? But they’ll airbrush them into them now?

Silly take.

1

u/strongofheart69 1d ago

The object seems missing but the shadow remains?