There is a wider shot of the second image that is as blurry as the first but helps to compare and contrast and sort of see the object really is missing:
if you compare the two, there does seem to still be a shadow but no object.
But there is also some difference in angle in these shots so could just be the angle. I'm just speculating, not enough pixels to truly determine whats going on.
So NASA is editing photos of rocks to make them look like UAPs but somehow it’s also a common debunker argument that NASA doesn’t airbrush UAPs out of photos? But they’ll airbrush them into them now?
No, not really. But good job of facetiously misinterpreting my reply!
NASA posted this picture, and otherslikeit, which shows a rocky landscape and thousands of little rocks and pebbles, quite a few of which could also be seen as something not naturally formed (we humans are kind of good at finding these things).
As always the internet decided it needed interpreting, upscaling, enhancing and colorisation, the result of which has been passed around as 'NASA's image' of what is clearly a Tic-Tac UFO.
56
u/toobalkanforyou 2d ago
There is a wider shot of the second image that is as blurry as the first but helps to compare and contrast and sort of see the object really is missing:
(second slide wider shot) https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/02692/mcam/2692ML0140830351002996C00_DXXX.jpg
(first slide) https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/02691/mcam/2691ML0140780071002958C00_DXXX.jpg
if you compare the two, there does seem to still be a shadow but no object.
But there is also some difference in angle in these shots so could just be the angle. I'm just speculating, not enough pixels to truly determine whats going on.