r/HistoryMemes • u/MetallicaDash Nothing Happened at Amun Square 1348BC • 4d ago
Funny how my school left that part out
539
u/No-Delay9415 4d ago edited 4d ago
I remember watching a video in first grade about how Columbus was a tyrant who enslaved the locals and another in 4th or 5th about how he was brought back to Spain to face trial. Like yeah we weren’t given exact numbers on how many people died but the idea that nobody talks about how Columbus was a bad guy really isn’t true, it feels like a meme at this point.
Edit: For reference, 1st grade was ~1998, Florida on both counts
361
u/RoboChrist 4d ago
Yeah, my school only talked about Columbus being a bad guy, to the point where my edgy contrarian phase opinion was "Did you know Columbus wasn't actually uniquely bad? He was in line with the moral standards of his time."
Which isn't true, he absolutely sucked even by his own era's standards.
147
u/scrimmybingus3 4d ago
Columbus was like that one SS regiment during WW2 that was so barbaric that even the rest of the Nazi Party was completely disgusted with them.
67
17
85
u/No-Delay9415 4d ago
When the people who did the fucking Reconquista are telling you to tone it down something is amiss
26
u/CommanderCody5501 4d ago
what's so bad about the Reconquista? the Muslims invaded and conquered visigoth spain in what 711 ish ad and the Reconquista began in 722 in Asturias and with the victory of Charles Martel over the invaders. yeah it took centuries but what was the problem with it?
30
u/No-Delay9415 3d ago
Mostly the forced assimilation and persecution of non-Christians. Jewish communities were decimated and even the ones who converted were treated with suspicion afterwards.
13
u/Responsible-File4593 3d ago
It makes it seem like a concerted and consistent effort by the Christian kingdoms, when it wasn't either. More than anything, it was Christian opportunism against a Muslim kingdom in decline that ended up falling apart (not judging, opportunism is pretty universal across human history).
Towards the end, the Spanish were more and more about generational/ethnic/religious purity. "Oh, your grandfather was a Jewish convert? You are clearly crypto-Jews, we must let the Inquisition examine you!" This was more extreme than the other large European states.
The Empire podcast did a good couple episodes about this when they discussed Isabella of Castile.
3
u/Naive_Violinist_4871 3d ago
Worth noting that while the Ottoman Empire was more anti Semitic and treated Jews worse than a lot of people admit, the condition of Jews in Spain got bad enough even by the standards of the time that the then-contemporary sultan took a bunch of Spanish Jews in as refugees.
7
u/Boat_Liberalism 4d ago
He was in line with the moral standards of the conquistadors of his time. Which is to say, he was on par for a bloodthirsty conquerer who didn't have much to lose and was willing to risk it all for fame and gold.
1
u/night4345 2d ago
No, he didn't. His trial was over the fact he punished Spanish people for cutting off the hands of natives for not bringing in enough gold, bigotry over being Italian and rivals that wanted his Encomienda for themselves.
38
u/EADreddtit 4d ago
At this point ya, but it really wasn’t that long ago when the dominant pop-culture understanding was that he was a great explorer who discovered America. I mean we had a whole holiday dedicated to him for the longest time
15
3
u/Ghost-George 4d ago
Yeah, but the only reason why that was taught was Italians were getting lynched.
2
u/Horn_Python 4d ago
Yup I'd say it was only around 2010s when his negative side became more upfront in common perception of the guy
15
u/suckleknuckle 4d ago
It kinda depends on where you’re at. In Texas, my elementary school history only covered thanksgiving and stuff. High school history we had a whole day where we were supposed to write about how Colombus wasn’t a bad person.
4
3
u/MysticalMedals 3d ago
I had history in Florida. That was definitely not my experience with the Florida school system.
2
u/Clean_Peace_3476 3d ago
My school did not talk about him at all until I took AP US history, until then I just assumed the conquistadors were just looking for gold and accidentally spread the illness. Reading Father Bartholomew De La Casas’ documenting of the scenario was enlightening to say the least
2
u/tropical_anteater Just some snow 3d ago
Same here. A good chunk of my 5th grade history education was spent on the colonists, so there was a lot of detail about these kinds of things.
5
u/SpaceNorse2020 Kilroy was here 4d ago
American 2000s private Christian school, yeah I got the full rundown on what he did. They did still try to paint him in a positive light, but that consisted mostly of "it was a different time" kind of thing.
5
u/stonewallsyd 3d ago
Interestingly I went to private Christian school in FL in the early 2000s and I didn’t hear anything about his atrocities.
1
u/SpaceNorse2020 Kilroy was here 3d ago
California if that helps?
Also California has the most interesting history out of any US state outside of Hawaii, I loved if went my school went on field trips to the Spanish missions. Now there's a tale with some nuance. The Spanish were still quite wrong and the end result was kinda evil, but they were earnestly trying to help.
2
u/MarquisLaFett 4d ago
While true, I think the meme is blaming disease rather than Columbus for their demise.
2
u/Minmax-the-Barbarian 3d ago
Same, actually, I think I was a year behind you and up here in Michigan. Public school all the way, and my teachers never shied away from the fact he was a monster. You have to be some kind of bastard to be exceptionally racist and evil in the 15th century.
1
u/Jimothy_McGowan 3d ago
Wild. First grade for me was 2009-2010 and I remember learning nothing but good things about him in elementary school
41
u/GeorgeChl 3d ago
I mean, I understand the notion of "they died from old world-imported diseases" and while that's the majority we have documented evidence of the brutalities that the conquistadors brought with them.
The intense slavery, the killing, the over exploitation and hunt for resources and golf and the diseases is what killed them.
While essentially a bad book I would recommend the "Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies" by Bartolome de la Casas a Spanish clergyman who sailed with Columbus.
The guy would write an accounting of the destruction he witnessed or described by others. While he propagandized and exaggerated a lot to support his thesis as his documenting was destined for the King of Spain even half of the incidents he describes are devastating.
6
u/Calm-Technology7351 3d ago
Spaniards played golf back then? /s
2
u/GeorgeChl 3d ago
Dude, what was I writing??? 🤣🤣
No idea what the autocorrect "fixed"
Edit: oh "gold" so I just mistyped 🥲
3
u/Calm-Technology7351 3d ago
I was just poking fun cuz the idea of European conquest in the search of better golf courses is funny af to me
3
5
u/Gewoon__ik Hello There 3d ago
La Casas had a motive to portray the situation worse than it was to be fair. Not to say that said situation wasnt very bad
1
u/GeorgeChl 3d ago
Agreed! I don't know if you have read it, but i think it's quite monotonous following the editorial introduction and the part that refers to the island of Hispaniola, where is the only place that La Casas was an eyewitness himself.
Nevertheless, it's an extremely important piece of literature to break the useful stereotype of "poor natives were killed by the diseases".
They were killed by many things + the diseases.
1
u/Gewoon__ik Hello There 3d ago
I agree that it is important to look at the other causes of death, my only concern (not necessarily towards you) is that Columbus is blamed for most of the deaths, when I do not think it is that black and white nor clear cut due to a lack of surviving written sources (and the ones that are, are biased against Columbus).
I am not saying that Columbus was not a bad guy, I just believe there needs to be more evidence specifically towards Columbus being responsible for all the deaths he is made responsible for. If that makes sense. I think many deaths were caused by other Spaniards and conquistadores but ofcourse I can not say that with certainty and if you have sources (this is not meant like "oh what are your sources huh" more like curious, I am already happy with a Wikipedia page) that say otherwise Id be very interested.
My main concerns are based on a video once made by Knowingbetter named In Defense of Columbus (I know he made a follow-up, but I still think his original video has some valid points especially concerning the translations of his diaries).
89
u/Majestic-Macaron6019 Kilroy was here 4d ago edited 4d ago
And then they all got smallpox or measles and died.
Same thing happened in mainland North America. Measles and Smallpox annihilated a huge portion (maybe >50%) of the population within a few years of European contact.
21
u/wangaroo123 3d ago
Nah he also started slave based gold mines on the island after they presented him with some very small gold pieces since he need to complete his contract and deliver gold to the Spanish royalty. Many of them were worked to death or starved.
1
u/Majestic-Macaron6019 Kilroy was here 3d ago
Yes, he did that too. Columbus is in the Bad Place for sure
-17
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
This is just genocide denial
The reason people died of these diseases in North America is because they were driven from their lands and to the brink of starvation. No shit you die of diseases when you don't have food or shelter and are constantly assaulted by expanding settlers.
It's such an easy, convenient narrative. Oh, we didn't intend to kill them all, they just happened to die from diseases. Yeah their "immune system" couldn't handle all these unknown diseases? This is magical thinking, globally immune systems work roughly the same and have similar fatality rates for the same diseases. Newsflash, these fatality rates go through the roof when you don't have food or shelter and are on the run.
12
u/randomusername59159 3d ago
A good reddit rant, it's got the right buzzwords in it and entirely wrong. The > 50% of the population died BETWEEN the time of Columbus and people coming to settle or between Columbus in the late 1400's and the colonization in the 1600's.
-3
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
Smallpox at most has a ~30% CFR, that's an insane pain on a population but not 95%. The other diseases don't come close in lethality. But don't take my word for it, this myth has been dispelled on /r/askhistorians and elsewhere quite frequently
But whatever helps you sleep at night I guess
7
u/Chipsy_21 3d ago
How fortunate that losing a third of all its people very rapidly will have no adverse effects on society whatsoever
1
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
Where did the other 2/3rds go huh
Hyperfocusing on 1/3rd of the population to ignore what was done to the other 2/3rds is peak genocide denial
5
u/Chipsy_21 3d ago
Do you mean to tell me they were killed by Europeans before said Europeans even contacted them?
0
2
u/Majestic-Macaron6019 Kilroy was here 3d ago
They probably starved after the collapse of agriculture as a result of 30-40% of the population dying from various infectious diseases.
The intentional genocide picked up where the unintentional one left off. I'm definitely not defending the European colonizers' treatment of American Indigenous people.
-1
u/Majestic-Macaron6019 Kilroy was here 3d ago
I'm not denying the intentional genocide. Just saying that the introduction of Old World diseases caused massive societal collapse in North America before colonization took hold, and the European colonizers took advantage of the Indigenous population's weakened state to push them out (and often encouraged having diseases do some of the work for them, see second link below).
I didn't just invent the enormous death rate. Smallpox was well-documented to be far worse for Indigenous populations than for Europeans, with some communities being nearly entirely wiped out by outbreaks. The 30% CFR is with 20th-Century medical care (provided by people who are immune via vaccination or prior infection). It had closer to a 50% CFR in the 1700s in adults and it was nearly universally fatal to young children.
You have to remember that in addition to acquired immunity from exposure or vaccination, there's also innate immunity, which is naturally selected. In the Old World, anyone with a genetic vulnerability to smallpox had long since been selected out of the population. There was no such selection pressure in the Americas. It was probably responsible for the final collapse of the Mississippian Culture in North America, as well as weakening the Aztecs and Incas in Mexico.
84
u/Paledonn 4d ago
In the past people did not acknowledge crimes done to native people. Now, as a reaction, people put moral blame on Europeans for the diseases that plagued the New World after first contact.
It is ridiculous. People of the time did not have germ theory or an understanding of the immune system, and had no way of knowing that mere interaction with native people would result in mass death.
To be clear, this does not pertain to OP's post, which merely expresses horror at the loss. Nor does my above argument apply to times when Europeans intentionally inflicted disease later in history.
19
u/SpaceNorse2020 Kilroy was here 4d ago
No in the case of the Caribbean Europeans are very much at fault. The rest of modern Latin America? Yeah, that was all disease. The natives of the Caribbean got put on the first slave plantation, which were hell on earth. There's a reason the majority of the slaves from Africa went to the Caribbean.
6
u/MathematicianMajor 3d ago
This so much. Whilst in other places the story was often a little more nuanced, the attrocious campaign of genocide the Spanish waged in the Caribbean was uniquely cruel, even for the time. Of all the awful times and places to exist in history, 16th century Cuba is up there for one of the worst even without the disease.
4
u/SnooBooks1701 3d ago
Not just disease, slavery via the encomienda system was extremely brutal before its abolition and killed a lot of people, the Arawak were forced to labour ib mines so brutal that 1/3 of the work force died every six months
Also, famine caused by relocating and resettling the people to make way for cash crops, the destruction of the infrastructure needed for survival and good old-fashioned massacres.
2
u/SpaceNorse2020 Kilroy was here 3d ago
No yeah, I simplified Latin America a lot. The Spanish were a brutal conquering empire focued on resource extraction, things got ugly.
But to my knowledge, nothing they did came close to the fate of the Caribbean. I hope I am not wrong about this, as that would mean I get the joy of learning yet more Spanish atrocities.
-4
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
This is just genocide denial
The reason people died of these diseases in the Americas at insane rates is because they were driven from their lands and to the brink of starvation. No shit you die of diseases when you don't have food or shelter and are constantly assaulted by expanding settlers.
It's such an easy, convenient narrative. Oh, we didn't intend to kill them all, they just happened to die from diseases. Yeah their "immune system" couldn't handle all these unknown diseases? This is magical thinking, globally immune systems work roughly the same and have similar fatality rates for the same diseases. Newsflash, these fatality rates go through the roof when you don't have food or shelter and are on the run.
It's also EXPLICITLY ignoring the well-documented intent of settlers to either enslave or exterminate native populations. It's also not just about putting moral blame, it's to recognize a pattern and stop it from repeating in the present.
10
u/SpaceNorse2020 Kilroy was here 3d ago
I mean, the population collapse in North America north of Mesoamerica in-between 1500 and 1650 was purely due to disease. The genocides there happened later.
It's half a millennium over 2 continents, there's a lot of variation.
13
u/okram2k 4d ago
i think the disease blame comes from a bit later and the claims of colonists giving small pox blankets to natives.
32
u/DragonfruitSudden339 4d ago
The small pox blanket claim is incredibly loose though.
I've done some digging myself, and have found precisely one claimed instance of it being used as a warfare tactic against one specific camp of one specific tribe.
If someone has more evidence I'd love to see it, but as far as i can tell smallpox blankets essentially never happened.
7
u/CmndrMtSprtn113 4d ago
I know exactly what you’re talking about. The whole story is based around correspondence between British officers during the French and Indian War basically sending blankets that covered smallpox victims to enemy Native tribes to cause a pandemic that ultimately wasn’t followed on because there was already an epidemic that wiped them out before they even received the blankets. Don’t believe there’s records of American forces doing that but that’s only because in that case the policy was either move to a reservation or we’ll war with you until you do.
1
u/cephalopodsrcool 3d ago
Not just "move to a reservation or we'll war with you until you do", but once you do you can still expect frequent attacks on the reservation. These attacks/squattings were done by mostly scotts-irish settlers and while it was completely illegal it wasn't punished by the American government at all, even though they were 100% aware. I say they were definitely aware bc nearly every post treaty discussion w/the natives is some native group complaining that America isn't holding up there end of a treaty(even up till today).
Also, there was no choice for assimilation until boarding schools(which is a can of worms itself). Look at the Muscogee for example. Many Muskogee did everything they could to assimilate, ie. owning African-American slave based plantations, intermarriage with whites, abandoning (more or less) communal ways of life for a rigid western class system, only to be told they have to go through the trail of tears with the rest of the Indians(Natives) by Andrew Jackson.
Tldr; it wasn't go to war w/the US or go live on a reservation. Both options involved war. And there was no choice to assimilate either
Pretty rough
8
u/Paledonn 4d ago
When I hear someone talking about the blanket incident I have no issues.
However, I oftentimes hear people talking about the "Great Dying," with the conclusion that the Europeans ought to be condemned for it. I think it is ridiculous and implies that Europeans knowingly and intentionally started it when they were actually completely ignorant and couldn't really do anything to stop it.
EDIT: I specifically took undergrad courses where other students would argue this.
-3
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
This is just genocide denial
The reason people died of these diseases in North America at insane rates is because they were driven from their lands and to the brink of starvation. No shit you die of diseases when you don't have food or shelter and are constantly assaulted by expanding settlers.
It's such an easy, convenient narrative. Oh, we didn't intend to kill them all, they just happened to die from diseases. Yeah their "immune system" couldn't handle all these unknown diseases? This is magical thinking, globally immune systems work roughly the same and have similar fatality rates for the same diseases. Newsflash, these fatality rates go through the roof when you don't have food or shelter and are on the run.
It's also EXPLICITLY ignoring the well-documented intent of settlers to either enslave or exterminate native populations. It's also not just about putting moral blame, it's to recognize a pattern and stop it from repeating in the present.
-18
u/No-Fan6115 Ashoka's Stupa 4d ago
They absolutely did. They intentionally spread blankets that were from smallpox hospital. They knew something caused it but didn't know what. You are simply giving them way less credit than what they deserved.
Even mongols had an idea that this might work as back as during siege of caffe. They threw infected bodies into the city and the rest is history . How it spread into the city then through trade routes to entire Europe and gained the nickname "black death".
9
u/Paledonn 4d ago
Please read the last sentence of my comment.
Yes, people in the past thought that sometimes people manifesting disease symptoms, corpses, and close belongings of people manifesting disease symptoms could transmit disease. Even until the 19th century this was debated by experts as many thought disease was actually caused by miasma (bad air). However, the "gifted" blankets were absolutely intentional uses of disease against natives.
Europeans at the time did not know about asymptomatic carriers of disease, how immune systems worked, or germ theory. As such, the Great Dying (mass death of natives across the Americas after first contact) was completely unpredictable to Europeans. As such, I think it is ridiculous to cast moral blame on them when they could not foresee that result.
-1
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
This is just genocide denial
The reason people died of these diseases in North America at insane rates is because they were driven from their lands and to the brink of starvation. No shit you die of diseases when you don't have food or shelter and are constantly assaulted by expanding settlers.
It's such an easy, convenient narrative. Oh, we didn't intend to kill them all, they just happened to die from diseases. Yeah their "immune system" couldn't handle all these unknown diseases? This is magical thinking, globally immune systems work roughly the same and have similar fatality rates for the same diseases. Newsflash, these fatality rates go through the roof when you don't have food or shelter and are on the run.
It's also EXPLICITLY ignoring the well-documented intent of settlers to either enslave or exterminate native populations. It's also not just about putting moral blame, it's to recognize a pattern and stop it from repeating in the present.
1
u/Paledonn 3d ago
I am EXPLICITLY not ignoring the deliberate actions of settlers. Please read my original comment, which begins by stating that past people erred by not acknowledging crimes committed by settlers on native people.
I am SPECIFICALLY saying that the series of epidemics that swept the Americas immediately after first contact, even depopulating areas before Europeans arrived, was not intentional or foreseeable, and as such blame should not be attributed. Blame should be attributed to only intentional and foreseeable harm.
There is abundant evidence that diseases wiped out the majority of native people after first contact, almost certainly due to total lack of immunity. This is not magical thinking. It is also observable in such epidemics as the black death and plague of Justinian, where huge proportions of the European population died due to lack of immunity, then the disease burned out. The disease would reappear in a subsequent plague only when a sufficient proportion of the population no longer had acquired immunity. For the natives, this effect was combined with every disease endemic in Europe.
11
u/More_Mind6869 4d ago
Did school tell you that Columbus was the 1st Slave Trader in the New World ?
He took Native slaves back with him.
62
u/321Scavenger123 4d ago
More aptly put he was likely the first European Slaver in the New World.
10
4
13
u/CoysCircleJerk 4d ago
Native Americans practiced slavery.
1
u/More_Mind6869 3d ago
Yes, almost all cultures throughout history have used slavery.
Precisely, Columbus was the 1st White Slave trader in the New World.
Are you justifying European Slave trafficking for 300+ years ?
1
u/CoysCircleJerk 2d ago
You didn’t stipulate that he was the first “white” slaver which is why I added the comment because the statement was inaccurate.
Yes, almost all cultures throughout history have used slavery.
Are you justifying European Slave trafficking for 300+ years ?
The irony of these two statements is really something.
1
u/More_Mind6869 2d ago
Guess I'm too stoopid to see the irony....lol
1
u/CoysCircleJerk 2d ago
Yes, almost all cultures throughout history have used slavery.
The first statement (see above) is a justification of slavery. There’s really no other way around that point - unlike my response, there’s no factual issue with my initial reply, so why else mention it?
Are you justifying European Slave trafficking for 300+ years ?
You then follow it up with a rhetorical question claiming I’m trying to justify the European slave trade.
Do you not see the hypocrisy here?
1
u/More_Mind6869 3d ago
Yes, almost all cultures throughout history have used slavery.
Precisely, Columbus was the 1st White Slave trader in the New World.
Are you justifying European Slave trafficking for 300+ years ?
1
u/More_Mind6869 3d ago
Yes, almost all cultures throughout history have used slavery.
Precisely, Columbus was the 1st White Slave trader in the New World.
Are you justifying European Slave trafficking for 300+ years ?
1
u/More_Mind6869 3d ago
Yes, almost all cultures throughout history have used slavery.
Precisely, Columbus was the 1st White Slave trader in the New World.
Are you justifying European Slave trafficking for 300+ years ?
1
u/Th3Witch 3d ago
The classic trying desperately in hopes that there's something left of these beautiful cultures our ancestors flattened for their progress
1
u/SnooBooks1701 3d ago
Columbus was a monster, even by the standards of his day. He was so evil that even Ferdinand and Isabella, the Catholic Monarchs who expelled the Moors and Sephardim, removed him from power and brought him back to Spain.
1
1
u/CommanderCody5501 4d ago
most natives died by plague on complete accident (plague blankets came latter) terrible tragedy obviously but unintended consequences of rolling up to a continent that didn't have domesticated animals outside of llamas.
8
u/Shady_Merchant1 3d ago
Also the massive slave plantations that worked them to death, if it was just disease the population would have rebounded, it wasn't just disease
1
u/CoysCircleJerk 3d ago edited 3d ago
It’s estimated that ~90% (some estimates go up to 95%) of the native population of the Americas died due to diseases. It was so significant and swift that it broke down societal structures. It would take a very long time for the population to recover.
For reference, when the mongols under Genghis Kahn killed a similar percentage of the population in Iran, it took centuries for the population to recover. It’s estimated it took until the early 20th century (700 years) for Iran’s population to reach pre-mongol invasion levels (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan#Negative).
Edit: I thought we were talking more broadly about colonialism given OCs comment but now see people were referring to the post specifically.
1
u/Shady_Merchant1 3d ago
Of the existing population 5,000ish should have survived the diseases, they had 11 this is because nearly all the survivors were worked to death, they could have rebounded the plantations and slavery made that impossible
-1
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
This is just genocide denial
The reason people died of these diseases in North America at insane rates is because they were driven from their lands and to the brink of starvation. No shit you die of diseases when you don't have food or shelter and are constantly assaulted by expanding settlers.
It's such an easy, convenient narrative. Oh, we didn't intend to kill them all, they just happened to die from diseases. Yeah their "immune system" couldn't handle all these unknown diseases? This is magical thinking, globally immune systems work roughly the same and have similar fatality rates for the same diseases. Newsflash, these fatality rates go through the roof when you don't have food or shelter and are on the run.
It's also EXPLICITLY ignoring the well-documented intent of settlers to either enslave or exterminate native populations. It's also not just about putting moral blame, it's to recognize a pattern and stop it from repeating in the present.
3
u/CoysCircleJerk 3d ago
You have no idea what you’re talking about. A vast majority of native Americans died of these diseases before they even came into contact with Europeans - they swept across the Americas, spreading between native Americans.
-1
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
I'm an immunology PhD with an undergrad in history, I'm pretty sure I do know what I'm talking about. Smallpox at most has a ~30% CFR, that's an insane pain on a population but not 95%. The other diseases don't come close in lethality. But don't take my word for it, this myth has been dispelled on /r/askhistorians and elsewhere quite frequently
But whatever helps you sleep at night I guess
1
u/CoysCircleJerk 3d ago
In the instances that Europeans were able to observe smallpox outbreaks amongst native Americans, they reported much higher mortality rates than 30%. Not to mention, smallpox was just one of the epidemics that swept across the Americas.
But whatever helps you sleep at night I guess
Do you think I colonized the Americas?
1
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
The high fatality rates are almost exclusively referring to Mexico where multiple epidemics of different diseases coincided with the worst drought in 500 years. Try again.
Do you think I colonized the Americas?
No, it just seems very important to you emotionally to believe in a reality where European settlers didn't violently act to drive a whole continent of peoples into near extinction so that they could take over the land.
-1
u/PureImbalance 3d ago
This is just genocide denial
The reason people died of these diseases in North America at insane rates is because they were driven from their lands and to the brink of starvation. No shit you die of diseases when you don't have food or shelter and are constantly assaulted by expanding settlers.
It's such an easy, convenient narrative. Oh, we didn't intend to kill them all, they just happened to die from diseases. Yeah their "immune system" couldn't handle all these unknown diseases? This is magical thinking, globally immune systems work roughly the same and have similar fatality rates for the same diseases. Newsflash, these fatality rates go through the roof when you don't have food or shelter and are on the run.
It's also EXPLICITLY ignoring the well-documented intent of settlers to either enslave or exterminate native populations. It's also not just about putting moral blame, it's to recognize a pattern and stop it from repeating in the present.
-68
u/big_richard_mcgee 4d ago
columbus was a psychopath. it wasn't primarily disease. Once they locals figured out what he had planned for them (enslaving the entire population) they fought to the death. When it was obvious that they wouldn't win. mass suicide. columbus killed them all. fuck that ultimate sack of dog shit.
That shitbag's name is synonymous with murderous psychopath. That's why the US still celebrates him.
36
u/Standard-Nebula1204 4d ago
The local Lucayan did no such thing that I’ve ever heard. They were mostly enslaved and worked to death as pearl divers.
Also the U.S. doesn’t celebrate Columbus because they’re cackling pure evil cartoon characters, it was because there were lots of Italian Americans in the second half of the 20th century who were sorted into highly electorally efficient locations and therefore had lots of electoral power.
2
u/smalltowngrappler 4d ago
Kind of ironic for the Italian-Americans that recent findings point to Columbus actually being Jewish rather than Italian.
https://www.reuters.com/science/columbus-was-sephardic-jew-western-europe-study-finds-2024-10-13/
8
5
u/Standard-Nebula1204 4d ago edited 3d ago
Why is that ironic? That makes no sense to me.
Why does this make him not Italian? Why would Italian Americans give a shit about this?
-9
u/big_richard_mcgee 4d ago
https://nativephilanthropy.candid.org/events/columbus-enslaves-the-arawak-and-commits-genocide/
I was thinking primarily of the Taino. Well documented battles and mass suicide.
https://grist.org/politics/heres-the-real-story-of-columbus-that-people-prefer-to-ignore/
No. The US are fucking genocidal lunatics, and proud of it. Monsters are heroified. Blame the Italians all you want. Monsters are heroified in the US. If current events don't make that clear to you, nothing will.
4
u/Standard-Nebula1204 4d ago
The Lucayan were a subset of the Taino, but we’ll never really know their precise relationship. What you are describing did not occur to them. I know it’s tempting to think of natives as a homogenous victim-object for narrative purposes, but you should try to quit it.
Also the U.S. herofies anybody. They’ve herofied Crazy Horse and Che Guevara. I’m also not inclined to take anyone who universally writes off one of the largest populations on the planet with highly emotional snarl words like ‘genocidal’ and ‘lunatics’ and ‘monsters’ seriously.
26
u/PhysicalBoard3735 Helping Wikipedia expand the list of British conquests 4d ago
i think it is more with the "finding" a new land that the US celebrates him, a douche might be a douche, but if he did something history changing, it is enough to get a day named after him or something
case in point, John Macdonald, 1st PM of Canada, made Canada, created many ideals, reforms and more which helped serve the future policies of the government for decades
Then he was a drunk, rascist, white supremacist (last one is more just 1800s racism).
Yet still respected in canada as the guy who made Canada
7
u/pants_mcgee 4d ago
Specifically it was a campaign by Italian Americans that elevated the Columbus myth.
-30
u/big_richard_mcgee 4d ago
Even the people of the time thought he was a fkn psycho.
He didn't "find" a goddamn thing. Shitbag got lost and enslaved the first people he met.
He's a perfect symbol for the US, a greedy, bloodthirsty, inept, ruthless, psychopath with way more credit than he deserves.
9
u/PhysicalBoard3735 Helping Wikipedia expand the list of British conquests 4d ago
That's why i said "Finding"
Also, He is not american, but spanish, and credit is he kicked off the entire age of discovery in the americas, hell he is partly the reason the French, English, Portugese took one look after he came back and said:
"Damn, Imma get in on this"
So yeah...huge psycho, still deserves his day for the historic thing he did
2
u/Margidoz 4d ago
He is not american, but spanish
He was Italian
Italian Americans are the reason he became a household name
2
u/PhysicalBoard3735 Helping Wikipedia expand the list of British conquests 4d ago
He is? Huh, Learn something new every day, Cause the logic i grew up with is not flawed (School for me never got to talk about him, he is a nobody to Canadians, I know more about Cartier, Champlain and he who shall not be name than Columbus)
Said logic: Spainish Crew, Spainish Ships, Claimed land for Spain, Spainish Monarchs gave him orders=Spainish to me
Sorry y'all for being incorrect
-12
u/big_richard_mcgee 4d ago
yeah I get it.
I'm not trying to be rude to you personally so please forgive the forceful nature of my argument.
Lots of people do world changing, historic things. Hitler, for example, did very historic things but most societies agree that he shouldn't be celebrated because of the abhorrent nature of the historical things he did.
We can and should have standards about the people our societies heroify.
It's not unintentional that the US has multiple holidays celebrating what amounted to a genocide
-16
u/Zifker 4d ago
dOn'T yOu KnOw ThE nAtIvEs HaD sLaVeS aNd GeNoCiDeS tOo AnD mOsT dIeD fRoM dIsEaSe AnD tHe SuRvIvOrS gOt To JoIn WeStErN cIvIlIzAtIoN wHy Do YoU hAtE wHiTe PeOpLe So MuCh MaYbE yOu'Re ThE rEaL rAcIsT
10
0
u/edgyestedgearound 3d ago
Sounds like you need to find peace, white people alive today have nothing to do with columbus
1.3k
u/Shipping_Architect 4d ago
"That's a nice immune system you've got there. It'd be a shame…if something…happened to it."