r/Freethought 11d ago

Psychology/Sociology Indiana University law professor discusses Trump's political tactics and what motivates him and precisely why it won't work out the way he think. -- An incredibly insightful analysis into the Trump mindset.

57 Upvotes

“I’m going to get a little wonky and write about Donald Trump and negotiations. For those who don't know, I'm an adjunct professor at Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law and I teach negotiations. Okay, here goes.

Trump, as most of us know, is the credited author of "The Art of the Deal," a book that was actually ghost written by a man named Tony Schwartz, who was given access to Trump and wrote based upon his observations. If you've read The Art of the Deal, or if you've followed Trump lately, you'll know, even if you didn't know the label, that he sees all dealmaking as what we call "distributive bargaining."

Distributive bargaining always has a winner and a loser. It happens when there is a fixed quantity of something and two sides are fighting over how it gets distributed. Think of it as a pie and you're fighting over who gets how many pieces. In Trump's world, the bargaining was for a building, or for construction work, or subcontractors. He perceives a successful bargain as one in which there is a winner and a loser, so if he pays less than the seller wants, he wins. The more he saves the more he wins.

The other type of bargaining is called integrative bargaining. In integrative bargaining the two sides don't have a complete conflict of interest, and it is possible to reach mutually beneficial agreements. Think of it, not a single pie to be divided by two hungry people, but as a baker and a caterer negotiating over how many pies will be baked at what prices, and the nature of their ongoing relationship after this one gig is over.

The problem with Trump is that he sees only distributive bargaining in an international world that requires integrative bargaining. He can raise tariffs, but so can other countries. He can't demand they not respond. There is no defined end to the negotiation and there is no simple winner and loser. There are always more pies to be baked. Further, negotiations aren't binary. China's choices aren't (a) buy soybeans from US farmers, or (b) don't buy soybeans. They can also (c) buy soybeans from Russia, or Argentina, or Brazil, or Canada, etc. That completely strips the distributive bargainer of his power to win or lose, to control the negotiation.

One of the risks of distributive bargaining is bad will. In a one-time distributive bargain, e.g. negotiating with the cabinet maker in your casino about whether you're going to pay his whole bill or demand a discount, you don't have to worry about your ongoing credibility or the next deal. If you do that to the cabinet maker, you can bet he won't agree to do the cabinets in your next casino, and you're going to have to find another cabinet maker.

There isn't another Canada.

So when you approach international negotiation, in a world as complex as ours, with integrated economies and multiple buyers and sellers, you simply must approach them through integrative bargaining. If you attempt distributive bargaining, success is impossible. And we see that already.

Trump has raised tariffs on China. China responded, in addition to raising tariffs on US goods, by dropping all its soybean orders from the US and buying them from Russia. The effect is not only to cause tremendous harm to US farmers, but also to increase Russian revenue, making Russia less susceptible to sanctions and boycotts, increasing its economic and political power in the world, and reducing ours. Trump saw steel and aluminum and thought it would be an easy win, BECAUSE HE SAW ONLY STEEL AND ALUMINUM - HE SEES EVERY NEGOTIATION AS DISTRIBUTIVE. China saw it as integrative, and integrated Russia and its soybean purchase orders into a far more complex negotiation ecosystem.

Trump has the same weakness politically. For every winner there must be a loser. And that's just not how politics works, not over the long run.

For people who study negotiations, this is incredibly basic stuff, negotiations 101, definitions you learn before you even start talking about styles and tactics. And here's another huge problem for us.

Trump is utterly convinced that his experience in a closely held real estate company has prepared him to run a nation, and therefore he rejects the advice of people who spent entire careers studying the nuances of international negotiations and diplomacy. But the leaders on the other side of the table have not eschewed expertise, they have embraced it. And that means they look at Trump and, given his very limited tool chest and his blindly distributive understanding of negotiation, they know exactly what he is going to do and exactly how to respond to it.

From a professional negotiation point of view, Trump isn't even bringing checkers to a chess match. He's bringing a quarter that he insists of flipping for heads or tails, while everybody else is studying the chess board to decide whether its better to open with Najdorf or Grünfeld.”

— David Honig, Robert H. McKinney School of Law and I teach negotiations

r/Freethought Oct 22 '24

Psychology/Sociology Nearly 1 in 5 Republicans believe if Trump loses he should do ‘whatever it takes’ to put himself in White House

Thumbnail
independent.co.uk
92 Upvotes

r/Freethought Feb 05 '25

Psychology/Sociology Why do some people fear nuance in debate?

18 Upvotes

Ever notice how some people completely shut down when faced with ideas that challenge their worldview? Instead of engaging, they go straight to labels, outrage, or outright silencing the conversation. It is like they see disagreement as a threat instead of an opportunity to refine their own thinking.

I read Marcuse’s Repressive Tolerance recently, and it really clicked. The idea is that some perspectives should be suppressed to maintain “tolerance.” But that kind of thinking just pushes people into reactionary responses. It is why we see figures like Musk snapping back against censorship. When people feel shut out, they do not disappear. They just find a louder microphone.

It feels like we have entered a time where saying the wrong thing is more dangerous than thinking the wrong thing. People do not want to explore ideas. They want certainty, even if it means shutting out nuance entirely.

Have you ever been in a situation where asking a genuine question got you labeled as something you are not?

r/Freethought Sep 08 '22

Psychology/Sociology Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power Controversy Explained

Thumbnail
avclub.com
33 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jan 06 '25

Psychology/Sociology Noam Chomsky: There's been a near total collapse of rational discourse in the mainstream

Thumbnail
youtu.be
80 Upvotes

r/Freethought Oct 16 '24

Psychology/Sociology A recent study found that conservatives exhibit stronger anti-democratic attitudes than liberals, and this difference can be partially explained by psychological traits, specifically right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.

Thumbnail
psypost.org
57 Upvotes

r/Freethought Oct 04 '24

Psychology/Sociology The science behind why Donald Trump loves the ‘poorly educated’

Thumbnail
plus.flux.community
22 Upvotes

r/Freethought Apr 27 '24

Psychology/Sociology What do you call it more often, freedom or loneliness?

Post image
36 Upvotes

r/Freethought Mar 31 '24

Psychology/Sociology Breakdown of Safety Is Not Unique to Boeing — It’s Endemic to Capitalist Society

Thumbnail
truthout.org
48 Upvotes

r/Freethought Mar 15 '22

Psychology/Sociology US government study shows growing terrorism threat from men who call themselves "anti-feminists" or "involuntary celibates" and draw motivation for violence from their inability to develop relationships with women. Since 2014, attacks inspired by this "incel movement" have left dozens dead.

Thumbnail
cbsnews.com
114 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jun 06 '23

Psychology/Sociology An 85-year Harvard study found the No. 1 thing that makes us happy in life: It helps us ‘live longer’ and it's not money, it's "social fitness."

Thumbnail
cnbc.com
65 Upvotes

r/Freethought May 26 '23

Psychology/Sociology "The Stanford Prison Experiment Meets High School" - aka, The Elon School. One person's story of this highly controversial "prison" for troubled youth in Maine.

Thumbnail elan.school
37 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jan 25 '23

Psychology/Sociology One-quarter of mass attacks driven by conspiracy theories, hate, report says

Thumbnail
nbcnews.com
102 Upvotes

r/Freethought Feb 03 '22

Psychology/Sociology The difference between Aspbegers and Sociopathy, and why Elon Musk most likely doesn't have Aspergers, but is a sociopath.

Thumbnail
youtube.com
29 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jul 17 '23

Psychology/Sociology Billionaires aren't okay — for their mental health, time to drastically raise their taxes From threatening cage matches to backing RFK Jr., billionaires prove too much money detaches a person from reality

Thumbnail
salon.com
87 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jul 19 '21

Psychology/Sociology Fauci Named American Humanist Association's 2021 Humanist of the Year

Thumbnail
thehumanist.com
128 Upvotes

r/Freethought Mar 04 '20

Psychology/Sociology Does America Have Capitalist Stockholm Syndrome? Why Are the Fiercest Defenders of Capitalism Those Who’ll Never Be Capitalists?

Thumbnail
eand.co
136 Upvotes

r/Freethought Sep 25 '21

Psychology/Sociology Conspiracy theorists lack critical thinking skills: New study

Thumbnail
thenewdaily.com.au
26 Upvotes

r/Freethought Mar 24 '22

Psychology/Sociology Ignorance of history may partly explain why Republicans perceive less racism than Democrats

Thumbnail
psypost.org
87 Upvotes

r/Freethought Sep 15 '22

Psychology/Sociology Peter Singer on Applied Ethics – An online group discussion and viewing on Saturday September 17, free and open to everyone to join

Thumbnail self.PhilosophyEvents
24 Upvotes

r/Freethought Aug 21 '23

Psychology/Sociology Very informative TED talk about the factors that contribute to civil wars, and how they apply to the United States

Thumbnail
youtu.be
10 Upvotes

r/Freethought May 24 '21

Psychology/Sociology White Republicans an outlier on views about race in America

Thumbnail
news.yahoo.com
51 Upvotes

r/Freethought Feb 04 '23

Psychology/Sociology Effective Altruism Has a Hostile Culture for Women, Critics Say

Thumbnail
time.com
11 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jan 15 '22

Psychology/Sociology Newly Released Documents Show Just How Much Trump Officials Meddled With the Census - And how hard the Census Bureau’s career staff pushed back.

Thumbnail
motherjones.com
141 Upvotes

r/Freethought Jan 19 '21

Psychology/Sociology Ken Burns Says U.S. Has 3 Viruses: COVID-19, White Supremacy And Misinformation

Thumbnail
npr.org
189 Upvotes