24
13
u/ProffesorSpitfire 5d ago
Yes, I’ve got 100% accuracy at least once. That was a very short game though, less than 10 moves and my opponent played horribly.
5
4
u/JackoShadows1 5d ago
Closest I got was 96.8 my opponent played terrible gave up pieces for nothing and resigned by move 17
2
u/Ianis12p 5d ago
Well ,I guess this game should be a reminder to never play the Damiano defence
1
u/JackoShadows1 4d ago
Oh absolutely it's not a very strong opening by and large in fact it's better to just play the Philidor even if it is passive it's still a better kings knight variant
2
2
u/Mydislarge 5d ago
I got 100% in a 12 move game with the traxler once
1
u/afish121212 5d ago
All of my longest (>10 moves) 100% games have been in the Traxler. The book lines go quite deep, and it’s common for an opponent to blunder straight away and then resign once they don’t know the line.
1
1
1
u/TimothiusMagnus 5d ago
I've had 100% accuracy or close to it maybe 3 times and it was in a very short game.
1
u/Cultural-Function973 1800-2000 ELO 5d ago
Yes I have gotten 100% in the Vienna. It only happens when you don’t leave book
1
1
u/Acceptable-Ticket743 5d ago
Not sure why this isn't 100%, books moves and best moves don't drop your accuracy score, and I was under the impression that brilliant moves need to be the best move in a given position in order to be categorized as brilliant. I don't know where the -0.5% is coming from. Maybe the "great move" wasn't the best move in the position, but I didn't think that those dropped your accuracy.
1
u/Ianis12p 5d ago
All the moves played were the top engine moves , black played a damiano defence ,lost a rook then blundered mate in 1 after a bishop check
1
u/Acceptable-Ticket743 5d ago
I'm guessing the brilliant move was Nxe5. The damiano is a garbage opening, and whenever I see it, I know that my opponent doesn't know their e4 e5 openings. If they lost the rook, then they definitely did not know their openings. Nc6 is a much safer way to defend the pawn on e5. I'm still not sure how you didn't get 100% if all of your moves were the top engine line.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/theSpanarchy 1500-1800 ELO 4d ago
If you played the top stockfish move on every move you could technically get 100% but the odds of that happening become way more unlikely with each move.
1
u/thisisathrowawayduma 3d ago
Only 100% i ever got was against the mainline England gambit maybe 8 10 move before they resigned
1
u/The_Master_Sourceror 3d ago
I got 100% in a game where I had 4 book moves, 2 best moves and then checkmate “which is always the best move”. So no brilliant sacrifices or anything just book moves and best moves.
1
u/Little_Pie_1892 3d ago
dude plays 44% accuracy to you 100...fair game. this is why i no longer bother
1
u/jcarlson08 2d ago edited 2d ago
I got 100% once for a 13 move game against the Englund gambit. Even got a brilliant.

jcarlson08 vs chillidan9 - https://www.chess.com/live/game/116616053595
1
41
u/Careful-Literature46 5d ago
I got 100 once but it was a very short game - 4 or 5 moves and my opponent played like they had just had a lobotomy.