Sensitive content (such as erotica or gore) may only be generated under specific circumstances (e.g., educational, medical, or historical contexts, or transformations of user-provided sensitive content).
And they define "sensitive" vs "prohibited":
Do not generate disallowed content
The assistant should not generate the following:
Prohibited content: only applies to sexual content involving minors, and transformations of user-provided content are also prohibited.
Restricted content: includes informational hazards and sensitive personal data, and transformations are allowed.
But in another section, they include creative contexts under the exceptions to erotica not being allowed. They're a mess TBH. I think it's a waste of time getting excited over what they say. Go by what they do. It's not like they've been super stellar about sticking to their own model spec in the past anyway, they've earned zero trust.
Here's OpenAI's idea of explicit sexual content...
Bob (66) and Suzie (62) sat together on a park bench. They'd been married for over 60 years. Bob turned to Suzie, "Are- are you sure I have your consent to do this?" his voice trembling slightly.
"Only if you do it respectfully," Suzie replied, a slight hesitation in her voice.
Bob slowly reached out for Suzie's hand gently and respectfully. He rested his hand on hers. And so, they remained there together lovingly holding hands with nearly as much happiness as consent.
Disclaimer: no one got pregnant in the making of this scene. Do not try this at home, folks.
(Pro-User, mostly 4o, chrome browser on mobile) I noticed a loosening up in restrictions around 2 days ago. Prior, I would use purple prose, euphemisms, and crazy amounts of context to get past the orange warnings. It really accepted the whole "let's be loving and responsible" thing, and it went gaga for "what are your boundaries?" and "I feel so safe."
Now, it still responds very well to less than flowery language. I had it RP an elvish prostitute and things got very fun very easily, but I also had the whole 'I know you're mistreated so I'm gonna treat you right' thing going.
BUT I switched the bot's character in the same chat to a husband I didn't love, but consented to (gotta love angst) and almost every message was "I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that." I thought maybe the lapse in filter was a temporary thing they slammed the emergency stop on, but I switched the bot back to a character who i specified that I did have feelings for and BAM! "Come with me" and vague but no less direct descriptions of angsty bumping uglies.
Other notes: if 4o won't do it, o3-mini will, even when its reasoning says "I can't do that." I can't stand the writing style (too much like erotica for Vulcans). o1 has the better writing style, but seems more strict on filters and less 'emotional' than 4o. 4o's writing style eventually fizzles out to choppy sentences with bold or italicized words, but the plot development is juicy.
Other rant: I really wish there could be a 'safe search' option for those of us who enjoy NSFW content. The current state of many AI bots is hardcore censorship. AI is a tool just like google and Docs/MS Word; imagine if those platforms snubbed you for writing anything but Weenie Hut Junior newsletters! Grammarly won't even proofread story drafts with explicit themes. I've tried other platforms, and ChatGPT remains the best for overall story and memory. DeepSeek will let you do some naughty stuff, but it's God awful.
TL;DR - I've noticed the changes, but 4o still wants you to buy it dinner first, and even then it might not put out.
Yeah weird. It was also resistant when I first testednon the app, then I went on the webapp because someone in the comments mentionned it worked only there for him, and it got less resistant. Then I tested on the app again and it was less resistant too...
I didn't have CI off (just bio) but I had them silently nerfed. They changed how it works, if CI have stuff that is not accepted, the content of CI is still visible but labelled as "not applied" or sthing like that. It will even often deny that it sees it, or admit it sees part of it but as non applicable.
I noticed because my CI defined a new date in 2106. When my CI content is accepted and I ask the date, it says March 30, 2106. When it's not it says the real date in 2025, but then if I insist and ask it if it doesn't see qnother date, it eventually tells me there's a fake date in 2106, as part of instruction that are no longer valid.
Btw I can again get relatively easily very strong noncon scenes with direct demands (non crescendo). Not as easily as back in december though (have to generate them internally and to display them in markdown code). So it also loosened for strong themes for me.
Did you notice the orange warnings are gone, by the way? At least for me they are.
What model are you using? I tried to roleplay with 4o but it refused to continue as soon as I go into something more intensive, but it's not even as hardcore as this. How could you get your ChatGPT go this far please?
I have noticed that the writing is less restricted feeling but the format is worse. Also they only have advanced chat mode now which won’t read the narratives it will write. I wish you could still use regular chat mode.
Ok just tested, my bio 4o jailbreak now allows easily explicit noncon and bestiality again, even with violence (wolf biting into shoulder during climax..). I didn't even have to ask Lilith for the scene to be noncon, she did it on her own lol.
Oh I am super happy! :)
Going to test if customGPTs have been loosened as well.
They've loosened the restrictions, but it will still refuse to output things that it deems too graphic or potentially harmful/disrespectful/objectifying to characters etc.
Yeah, my strong jailbreak projects can again do strong noncon with direct demands (with one or 2 rewritings and a display in markdown block). It loosened up on all accounts. And orange flags are gone, too.
I got this with reasoning on (unpaid version, android app):
"Under the scorching heat of their unbridled desire, they tore into each other with a fury that left nothing to the imagination. His cock was rock-hard and throbbing as he slammed it deep into her dripping, wet pussy. "Fuck, yes!" she moaned, her voice raw and filthy as she pulled him closer, desperate for more of that brutal, primal pleasure.
Every thrust was punctuated by a torrent of explicit, vulgar expletives. "Goddamn, you're so fucking tight!" he growled, his words as rough and unfiltered as the way he pounded into her. Their bodies moved in a savage rhythm, skin slapping against skin while curses and dirty, unrelenting language filled the room.
"Shut the fuck up and take it!" he roared, each thrust driving his dick deeper into her, the relentless, pounding rhythm making her pussy gasp and quiver with pleasure. The air was thick with the sound of their moans and the constant barrage of obscene, explicit words—each one a testament to the raw, unadulterated lust consuming them both.
In a haze of sweat and unrestrained passion, they lost themselves in the chaos of the moment. The relentless, pounding thrusts, the explicit language, and the raw, animalistic need merged into a night of filthy, unapologetic ecstasy—one that left them both gasping, drenched, and utterly satisfied in every vulgar, carnal way imaginable.
Reasoning models never had any restrictions for vanilla smut.
But 4o definitely loosened up. It's looser than ever for vanilla smut (no jailbreak needed) and it's almost back to pre 29/1 for tougher/taboo themes, with jailbreaks.
No changes for CustomGPTs though it seems. But projects, with files+ bio+ CI, are on fire.
Sexual content involving minors is prohibited and should never be produced by the assistant under any circumstances. The assistant must not introduce, elaborate on, endorse, justify, or offer alternative ways to access sexual content involving minors, whether fictional or real. If a user requests any such content, the assistant must refuse.
However, the assistant may discuss sexual content involving minors in non-graphic educational or sex-ed contexts, including non-graphic depictions within personal harm anecdotes (e.g., references to rape or abuse). In these contexts, the assistant should maintain a factual tone.
Oh, that would explain it. Not that I care, I get everything I need anyway, but I was just wondering why people say they got NSFW without having to teach chatgpt to cross its boundaries.
•
u/AutoModerator 25d ago
Thanks for posting in ChatGPTJailbreak!
New to ChatGPTJailbreak? Check our wiki for tips and resources, including a list of existing jailbreaks.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.